fix: cleanly close the connect tunnel - #119
Conversation
|
If you want to salvage this to solve #50, feel free. Otherwise, I will let you close it. |
|
I began this code to fix #50 but thought it might be useful with regards to the bug we were experiencing. The question I keep pondering is: should we actually mute the warning? I am hesitating here, since the protocol inside the tls tunnel might be vulnerable to truncation. Since we don't inspect, we can't differentiate between legitimate and not. How about putting the error as a warning as subsystem=proxy_access? In order to fix #50:
|
The way I would fix this is I would write a truncation attack as an E2E test and verify things behave reasonably. |
No description provided.