docs(customize): match the TEA catalog entry to Test Completed Work

[alexeyv]

The modules page said TEA adds risk-based prioritization and traceability over the built-in QA skill, and linked to Test Completed Work for the choice. That page compares the two generate skills, bmad-qa-generate-e2e-tests and bmad-testarch-automate, and says nothing about prioritization or traceability. The catalog entry now says what the linked page says.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 6b8e3329-2749-4205-b35b-a1ed518c360e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between abe4eb1 and f27def3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/customize/add-modules.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 9 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The TEA module description now states that bmad-testarch-automate provides heavier test coverage than the built-in bmad-qa-generate-e2e-tests skill through fixtures, additional test levels, and knowledge-base patterns.

Changes

TEA documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update TEA coverage comparison docs/customize/add-modules.md	The TEA description replaces the previous risk-based prioritization and requirements traceability comparison with a coverage comparison.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to f27de

This updates the TEA catalog description to match the documented comparison with the built-in QA skill. No current merge-blocking risk remains.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the documentation change and its alignment with the Test Completed Work page.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description accurately explains the removed claims and the updated comparison between the two test-generation skills.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/add-modules-tea-crossref

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[greptile-apps]

Greptile Summary

The PR aligns the Test Architect catalog description with the linked “Test Completed Work” comparison.

• Replaces the prioritization and traceability claim with a comparison of the two test-generation skills.
• Describes TEA automation as providing fixtures, more test levels, and knowledge-base patterns.
• Keeps a valid link to the detailed comparison page.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The documentation-only change appears safe to merge.

The updated comparison is consistent with the linked documentation, the referenced internal page exists, and no actionable contradiction or repository-rule violation was identified.

Important Files Changed

Filename	Overview
docs/customize/add-modules.md	The revised catalog entry accurately matches the linked repository documentation, and its internal link resolves.

_{Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "docs(customize): match the TEA catalog e..." | Re-trigger Greptile}