Improved performace

[EvandroLG]

It's best to access local variables than global

[bkardell]

I like this, but we are working on a complete rewrite to align with the css aliases working draft that we helped inspire..not sure it's worth messing with the 0.6.x codebase at this point.
What do you think?

[EvandroLG]

It's great.
I think we can update, because it's a very simple change - it's not a
dangerours change.

Are you working in a engine-model-restructure branch?
If so, I want help you, man ;)

My best

2014-04-09 11:35 GMT-03:00 Brian Kardell notifications@github.com:

I like this, but we are working on a complete rewrite to align with the
css aliases working draft that we helped inspire..not sure it's worth
messing with the 0.6.x codebase at this point.
What do you think?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/32#issuecomment-39970983
.

Att,
Evandro

[bkardell]

No this is actually the next branch and it is a really really significant change, basically a complete reboot to align with the actual proposal that is developing. We want to fill the proposal and allow people to use it and provide feeback/improve it.

If you're actually using Hitch and feel that there is value in a minor update, please have a look at the couple of open pulls and let us know which you feel are valuable to you and we can consider that. We keep thinking that we are going to get time to drive things forward, but everything is time consuming as things are still gelling, so I cannot really give some ETA. @clintjhill may have comments/thoughts

[clintjhill]

I've reviewed the PR and I'd say that while this is a great set of updates - I'd prefer to just focus on the /next branch instead. I'm of the opinion that performance related improvements to previous version would be misplaced efforts.

Brian and I are coordinating a push to the /next branch soon and we'd love your participation there. As Brian mentioned it's a reboot. We'd love your eyes on it for the same kinds of perf updates you applied here.

[bkardell]

Worth mentioning that what is committed in github is probably out of date
and requiring expanation that you wont find here... maybe we can move some
of that discussion public and get the commits up to date

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Clint Hill notifications@github.com wrote:

I've reviewed the PR and I'd say that while this is a great set of updates

• I'd prefer to just focus on the /next branch instead. I'm of the opinion
  that performance related improvements to previous version would be
  misplaced efforts.

Brian and I are coordinating a push to the /next branch soon and we'd love
your participation there. As Brian mentioned it's a reboot. We'd love your
eyes on it for the same kinds of perf updates you applied here.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/32#issuecomment-40014561
.

Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com