SafetyHook Discussion In the Wiki#11
Draft
notchyves wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I, along with a few other modders, believe that SafetyHook is better than MinHook for beginner users, and although the wiki currently briefly touches on SafetyHook, it does not thoroughly go through it. Furthermore, SafetyHook, in my opinion, has an easier API for users to start with that is cleaner, especially in things like handling calling original functions inside the hook.
I would hopefully like to have mentioning of both SafetyHook and MinHook, while having SafetyHook being the default hooking library as it is more versatile long-term, and has a larger API for users to work with as they advance. Therefore, this pull request is being made as a work-in-progress, to explore adding SafetyHook to the wiki.