Skip to content

nix: init at 1.0.0-unstable#2

Open
Ghastrum wants to merge 2 commits into
baairon:mainfrom
Ghastrum:nix-init
Open

nix: init at 1.0.0-unstable#2
Ghastrum wants to merge 2 commits into
baairon:mainfrom
Ghastrum:nix-init

Conversation

@Ghastrum

@Ghastrum Ghastrum commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

In-app testing:

  • Searches
  • Downloads
  • Seeds
  • Creates ~/Downloads/torlink directory
  • All navigation and keys works (couldn't test retry failed)

Nix:

  • Ignore scripts flag for broken ip-set preinstall
  • Download and extract nodeDatachannel to circumvent sandboxed build environment

@Ghastrum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@baairon Hope you're doing well and congrats on your repo blowing up 😁

I didn't get any feedback on this PR, and you didn't close it. Just let me know about any changes, or if you want a nix flake in your repo at all.

Current plans:

  • Updating package.nix to use the latest commit rev and hash.
  • Removing my install instructions from project root README.md, and adding it to a new README.md within the nix/ folder.
  • If there is interest I can submit the package to nixpkgs-unstable

I can have these changes done by late today or early tomorrow.

@baairon

baairon commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Hey, sorry, still didn't forget about this. And yeah, if you can have these changes proposed for me to review, that will be amazing. I just don't want to make the main README longer than it already is.

@Ghastrum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hey, sorry, still didn't forget about this. And yeah, if you can have these changes proposed for me to review, that will be amazing. I just don't want to make the main README longer than it already is.

Totally understandable. I'll move it inside the nix/ folder and keep the main README.md clean.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants