fix: topo install command needs to include target

[federicobozzini]

Changes

• added --target flag to the topo install fix command

###Before

$ topo health --target xxx
Host
----
Topo: ✅ (topo)
SSH: ✅ (ssh)
Curl: ✅ (curl)
Container Engine: ✅ (docker)

Target
------
Destination: ssh://xxx
Connectivity: ✅
Container Engine: ✅ (docker)
Remoteproc Runtime: ⚠️ ("remoteproc-runtime" not found on remote target's $PATH)
  Fix: Install the remoteproc runtime
  Cmd: topo install remoteproc-runtime
Remoteproc Shim: ⚠️ ("containerd-shim-remoteproc-v1" not found on remote target's $PATH)
  Fix: Install the remoteproc runtime
  Cmd: topo install remoteproc-runtime
Hardware Info: ✅ (lscpu)
Subsystem Driver (remoteproc): ✅ (imx-rproc)

###After:

$ topo health --target xxx
Host
----
Topo: ✅ (topo)
SSH: ✅ (ssh)
Curl: ✅ (curl)
Container Engine: ✅ (docker)

Target
------
Destination: ssh://xxx
Connectivity: ✅
Container Engine: ✅ (docker)
Remoteproc Runtime: ⚠️ ("remoteproc-runtime" not found on remote target's $PATH)
  Fix: Install the remoteproc runtime
  Cmd: topo install remoteproc-runtime --target ssh://xxx
Remoteproc Shim: ⚠️ ("containerd-shim-remoteproc-v1" not found on remote target's $PATH)
  Fix: Install the remoteproc runtime
  Cmd: topo install remoteproc-runtime --target ssh://xxx
Hardware Info: ✅ (lscpu)
Subsystem Driver (remoteproc): ✅ (imx-rproc)

[muchzill4]

It's almost as if this test was screaming at us: don't do it this way.

I have some reservations about making TargetDependencies a function for the sake of making a single fix contain the --target. I'm not sure if this is the best way to model this. Did you explore any other way to do this? 🤔

[federicobozzini]

Another idea I had was to change generateDependencyReport but the result is awful. I definitely prefer this approach. I think it allows decently with how connectivityCheck works.