Skip to content

Document memory-only skill routing#73

Open
ariobarin wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/memory-skill-routing
Open

Document memory-only skill routing#73
ariobarin wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/memory-skill-routing

Conversation

@ariobarin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Keeps legacy memory skill material in maintainer review unless fresh examples justify promotion.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2b3c9a4b2d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".


## Memory-Only Skills

Treat files under `C:\Users\Administrator\.codex\memories\skills` as candidate

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Use CODEX_HOME instead of an Administrator path

The root AGENTS.md review guidelines call out hardcoded Codex-home paths; this workflow now points reviewers at C:\Users\Administrator\.codex\memories\skills instead of the active Codex home (CODEX_HOME/-CodexHome). On any machine where Codex runs under another user or CODEX_HOME is overridden, following this guidance inspects the wrong directory and can cause memory-only skill material to be missed or pulled from stale local history.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant