Skip to content

Add Introduction page, make Alternatives a pure survey#3

Merged
antonkomarev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/introduction-page
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

Add Introduction page, make Alternatives a pure survey#3
antonkomarev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/introduction-page

Conversation

@antonkomarev

@antonkomarev antonkomarev commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • New Introduction page (first in the sidebar): the certel concept — what it owns itself (scheduler, alert state, webhook templating), STARTTLS, metrics as optional output — plus the "why we built it" reasoning moved out of Alternatives, ending with a pointer to the survey for readers whom certel's trade-offs don't fit.
  • Alternatives becomes a pure survey: comparison table, what we borrowed, license constraints; its intro links back to Introduction for the reasoning.
  • Landing page gets an Introduction card first; Alternatives card subtitle updated.
  • Corrected the ssl_exporter compatibility claim on both pages: metric names and meanings match, but the label model differs (host vs instance), so dashboards port with a label swap — not "unchanged" (per metrics.md).

The concept description and the "why we built our own" reasoning lived
in the Alternatives survey. Move them into a new Introduction page that
opens the sidebar; Alternatives keeps the raw material (comparison
table, what we borrowed, license constraints) and points back for the
reasoning.

Also correct the ssl_exporter compatibility claim on both pages: metric
names and meanings match, but the label model differs (host vs
instance), so dashboards port with a label swap, not unchanged.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
@antonkomarev
antonkomarev merged commit 2b87f71 into main Jul 15, 2026
5 checks passed
@antonkomarev
antonkomarev deleted the docs/introduction-page branch July 15, 2026 17:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant