chore: add repository foundation#1
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 37 minutes and 23 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR establishes the foundational repository configuration for agent-trail/spec by adding GitHub issue and pull request templates, contribution and security documentation, local development infrastructure via mise, a CI verification workflow, and automated dependency management via Renovate. ChangesRepository Foundation Setup
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request establishes the repository's foundational configuration, including GitHub issue and pull request templates, contributing guidelines, licensing, security policies, and local development tooling using mise and hk. The review feedback identifies a runtime evaluation error in the Pkl configuration (hk.pkl) due to a missing instantiation keyword, suggests simplifying the setup documentation in README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md by utilizing the defined setup task, and recommends removing a redundant timezone property from renovate.json.
Important
The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml:
- Line 6: Remove the trailing blank line at EOF in each issue template file so
there are no extra blank lines after the final YAML content; specifically edit
config.yml, bug.yml, rfc.yml and task.yml to delete the final empty line so the
files end immediately after their last YAML entry.
In @.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:
- Line 1: Add a top-level H1 heading above the existing "## Summary" to satisfy
markdownlint; update the template by inserting a first-line H1 such as "# Pull
Request" (or similar descriptive title) immediately before the existing "##
Summary" section so the file begins with an H1 heading.
In @.github/workflows/guardrails.yml:
- Around line 3-7: Add a GitHub Actions concurrency block at the root of the
workflow to prevent stale duplicate runs by grouping by branch or workflow and
enabling cancel-in-progress; specifically, insert a top-level concurrency
configuration (e.g., using group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }} and
cancel-in-progress: true) so pushes to branch "main" will cancel any in-progress
older runs and avoid wasted CI capacity.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: f25a600a-26f0-44c0-818b-743a70447e35
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
hk.pklis excluded by!**/*.pkl
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug.yml.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/rfc.yml.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/task.yml.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.github/workflows/guardrails.ymlCONTRIBUTING.mdLICENSES.mdREADME.mdSECURITY.mdmise.tomlrenovate.json
|
Ready to review this PR? Stage has broken it down into 3 individual chapters for you:
Chapters generated by Stage for commit 97ff3cb on Jun 12, 2026 3:57pm UTC. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1)
1-22: 🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick winAdd Linear issue linkage guidance to PR template.
The template guides contributors on public impact and verification, which aligns with learnings and AGENTS.md instructions. However, the documented requirement to "Link the Linear issue in pull request descriptions" is not explicitly prompted in the template itself. Contributors relying solely on the PR template (rather than cross-referencing AGENTS.md) may miss this step.
Consider adding a section or note to prompt for the Linear issue link. This ensures all three documented PR requirements are self-contained in the template.
💡 Example addition (optional)
You could add a brief section after Summary or before Public Impact:
## Summary - + +## Related Issue + +Link to Linear issue (e.g., ATF-123): ## Public ImpactOr add an inline note in the Summary section reminding contributors to include the Linear link.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md around lines 1 - 22, Update the PR template to explicitly prompt for the Linear issue link by adding a short prompt or checkbox near the existing "## Summary" (or just before "## Public Impact") asking contributors to "Link the Linear issue (required)"; modify the heading block that contains "## Summary" so it includes this instruction and, if desired, a corresponding checkbox or line for the URL to ensure the PR description captures the Linear issue link consistently.Source: Learnings
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Outside diff comments:
In @.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:
- Around line 1-22: Update the PR template to explicitly prompt for the Linear
issue link by adding a short prompt or checkbox near the existing "## Summary"
(or just before "## Public Impact") asking contributors to "Link the Linear
issue (required)"; modify the heading block that contains "## Summary" so it
includes this instruction and, if desired, a corresponding checkbox or line for
the URL to ensure the PR description captures the Linear issue link
consistently.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 412cace8-bc2d-485d-a762-a84302f3021b
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
hk.pklis excluded by!**/*.pkl
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug.yml.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/rfc.yml.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/task.yml.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.github/workflows/guardrails.ymlAGENTS.mdCLAUDE.mdCONTRIBUTING.mdLICENSEREADME.mdmise.tomlrenovate.json
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug.yml
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/rfc.yml
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/task.yml
1 participant
Summary
Refs ATF-7, ATF-8, ATF-9.
Verification