Skip to content

feat: create_new support for .xlam add-ins - #9

Merged
WilliamSmithEdward merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
xlam-create-new
Aug 2, 2026
Merged

feat: create_new support for .xlam add-ins#9
WilliamSmithEdward merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
xlam-create-new

Conversation

@WilliamSmithEdward

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Wires the new blank_excel_addin.xlam template into create_new, same bake pattern as xlsb. Live-verified: the built add-in loads in Excel with ThisWorkbook.IsAddin = True and its macro runs clean under the popup-aware harness. 392 tests, pyright strict, ruff all green.

Bake the freshly Excel-authored blank_excel_addin.xlam into the
templates module via the new scripts/bake_xlam_template.py (same
strip-Module1 + zlib + base85 splice pattern as the xlsb bake), and
dispatch .xlam in ExcelFile.create_new alongside .xlsm and .xlsb.
The template carries the same module set as the workbook templates
(ThisWorkbook, Sheet1, bare Module1), so the standard create-then-
set_module flow works unchanged.

Verified in live Excel via the popup-aware harness: a create_new
.xlam with a sentinel macro loads and runs, and ThisWorkbook.IsAddin
reports True, confirming Excel treats the output as a genuine add-in.
Tests cover the create/edit/save/reopen round trip and the bare
Module1 template contract.
@WilliamSmithEdward
WilliamSmithEdward merged commit 7434919 into main Aug 2, 2026
8 checks passed
@WilliamSmithEdward
WilliamSmithEdward deleted the xlam-create-new branch August 2, 2026 06:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant