Skip to content

fix: remove w3c cli tool mention#98

Merged
rongquan1 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/remove-w3c-cli-tool-mention
Dec 26, 2025
Merged

fix: remove w3c cli tool mention#98
rongquan1 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/remove-w3c-cli-tool-mention

Conversation

@RishabhS7

@RishabhS7 RishabhS7 commented Dec 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

remove w3c cli tool mention

Jira Ticket

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated README formatting for improved clarity and consistency.
    • Reformatted packages table with better alignment and spacing.
    • Added w3c-issuer and w3c-vc packages to documentation.
    • Added explicit npm test command to Running the code section.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README documentation has been reformatted to improve table column alignment and spacing. Package listings have been reorganized including w3c-issuer and w3c-vc entries. Section formatting across Getting Started, Running the code, and related areas has been adjusted for consistency, with an explicit npm test step added.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Formatting
README.md
Reformatted Packages table with adjusted column alignment and spacing; reorganized package rows to include w3c-issuer and w3c-vc; adjusted indentation and bullet/numbering in Getting Started and Running the code sections; added explicit npm run test step; minor heading and section spacing adjustments throughout.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A hop through the README so neat,
Tables aligned, formatting complete,
Packages arranged in perfect row,
A test step shines with pristine glow,
Documentation polished bright,
Now every word sits just right!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is incomplete. It only provides a summary section with minimal detail, lacking the required Changes, Issues, and Releases sections from the template. Complete the description by adding Changes section detailing what was modified, Issues section with related tickets, and Releases section with channel and ETA information.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title mentions removing w3c CLI tool mention, but the actual changes primarily involve reformatting the README (table alignment, spacing, and package reorganization) with only minor mention of CLI tool removal not evident in the summary. Clarify whether the main objective is removing w3c CLI tool mention or reformatting the README. The title should reflect the primary change more accurately.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/remove-w3c-cli-tool-mention

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c6144c and 5cb5ef7.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md
🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (3)

1-17: Well-executed documentation reformatting.

The table reorganization and column alignment improve readability. The package list is now clearly structured with consistent npm registry links.


42-48: Clear and concise build/test instructions.

The addition of the explicit npm run test step improves developer clarity on the testing workflow. The instruction sequence is logical and properly formatted.


1-49: Confirm complete removal of w3c cli tool references from README.md.

The provided snippet (lines 1-49) shows no visible cli or command-line tool references, but since the code display explicitly excludes removed or replaced lines, a complete verification of the removal across the entire file is required.

Comment thread README.md
1. Prepare and Sign the VC payload. [link](https://github.com/TrustVC/w3c/tree/main/packages/w3c-vc#1-signing-a-credential)
3. Verify
1. Verify the signed VC. [link](https://github.com/TrustVC/w3c/tree/main/packages/w3c-vc#2-verifying-a-credential)
2. Verify the credentialStatus [link]()

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Complete the broken link placeholder.

Line 40 has an incomplete link with an empty URL: [link](). Either provide the valid URL reference for verifying credentialStatus or remove the placeholder.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around line 40, the credentialStatus verification link is a broken
placeholder "[link]()", so replace the empty URL with the correct verification
URL (or a relative doc anchor) or remove the placeholder entirely; update the
markdown so the line either reads "2. Verify the credentialStatus [correct-URL]"
with a valid target or simply "2. Verify the credentialStatus" if no link is
available.

@rongquan1 rongquan1 merged commit 66072ee into main Dec 26, 2025
19 checks passed
@rongquan1 rongquan1 deleted the fix/remove-w3c-cli-tool-mention branch December 26, 2025 09:44
nghaninn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2025
@tradetrustimda

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

nghaninn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2025
@tradetrustimda

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@tradetrustimda

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

nghaninn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2025
@tradetrustimda

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

nghaninn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2025
@tradetrustimda

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants