Skip to content

docs(winds): close T055 Git observations - #34

Merged
TheHalfMoon merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/003-t055-closeout
Aug 17, 2026
Merged

docs(winds): close T055 Git observations#34
TheHalfMoon merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/003-t055-closeout

Conversation

@TheHalfMoon

@TheHalfMoon TheHalfMoon commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Purpose

Close Spec 003 / T055 in canonical task truth after the implementation, exact-head review gates, merge, and post-merge canonical proof are complete.

Canonical implementation evidence

  • implementation PR: feat(winds): observe Git state around command boundaries #33
  • final exact implementation head: 59d1abe0d22e6b7f11dbfa21a4b8edde2f3df0ee
  • exact-head quality #328: PASS
  • exact-head windows-terminal #107 on official windows-latest: PASS
  • exact-head release-candidate #178: PASS
  • SC-001 deterministic 100-cycle soak: PASS
  • Linux x86-64 and macOS arm64 release/license artifacts: PASS
  • exact-head correctness/safety review: PASS
  • exact-head Ponytail v4.9.0 simplicity review: PASS
  • Qodo fresh exact-head T055 review: no actionable correctness, safety, or active-spec issues
  • unresolved review threads: 0

Merge and canonical proof

PR #33 merged with expected-head and unchanged-main guards as canonical main:

c7bf630063e72e89a1bff1bb7178b0cdf43e207d

Post-merge canonical checks on that exact main:

  • quality #329: PASS
  • windows-terminal #108: PASS

This PR

Changes only the T055 checklist line in specs/003-workspace-execution-spine/tasks.md from open to closed and records the canonical evidence chain above.

No source, migration, dependency, workflow, runtime, authority, or product behavior changes are made here.

T056 remains NOT STARTED. This closeout does not authorize or implement history/transcript retention, secret policy, CLI/timeline work, daemon/public protocol, plugin/MCP/ACP/A2A/Agent Fleet behavior, or any later task.


Summary by cubic

Closes Spec 003 task T055 by marking it complete in specs/003-workspace-execution-spine/tasks.md and recording the canonical evidence chain after implementation and post-merge checks. This is a docs-only update that formalizes the shipped Git observation slice.

Review notes

  • Edits one checklist item: checks T055 and appends the acceptance evidence summary.
  • No source, workflow, dependency, or runtime changes.
  • No migration or rollout actions required.

Written for commit 61d4416. Summary will update on new commits.

Review in cubic

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Grey Divider

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Grey Divider

Tip of the day
💡 Did you know, you can route each action level your way: inline, summary, both, or drop

More tips ↗ | Customize Qodo ↗ | Qodo docs ↗

Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@TheHalfMoon, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 23 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used all 3 included reviews currently available under your plan.

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: ef51fa1f-29c0-4474-8503-967aca7d3199

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7bf630 and 61d4416.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • specs/003-workspace-execution-spine/tasks.md

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary by Qodo

Docs: close Spec 003 T055 Git observations with canonical evidence

📝 Documentation 🕐 Less than 5 minutes

Grey Divider

AI Description

• Mark Spec 003 task T055 (Git observations) as complete.
• Record exact-head CI/review/merge hashes as canonical proof.
• Clarify scope boundaries: no new runtime behavior and T056 remains not started.
High-Level Assessment

The approach is appropriate for a closeout PR: update the task checklist status and record the canonical evidence chain without touching implementation. No alternative strategy would materially improve reviewability or correctness for this change.

Files changed (1) +1 / -1

Documentation (1) +1 / -1
tasks.mdClose T055 checklist item and append canonical evidence chain +1/-1

Close T055 checklist item and append canonical evidence chain

• Marks T055 as completed and appends the canonical implementation/CI/review/merge evidence (exact-head SHA, CI runs, post-merge verification) directly on the task line. Leaves neighboring tasks (e.g., T056) unchanged and explicitly scopes out non-goals.

specs/003-workspace-execution-spine/tasks.md

@TheHalfMoon
TheHalfMoon merged commit f089cda into main Aug 17, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant