fix: update README to reflect SVD decomposition in all sections#88
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughReplaced QR decomposition references with Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) across README; renamed Part 2 API to Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 45 minutes and 21 seconds.Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
README.md (2)
145-145:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 MinorReplace remaining QR references in Part 3 with SVD for consistency.
Line 145 and Line 245 still describe a QR solver, but the benchmark code uses
svd_decompose(part3/benchmark.py). These lines are now stale and conflict with the README’s SVD migration.Suggested patch
-Present only if activated during Sprint 3 planning. Compares Gaussian elimination, QR solver, and Gauss-Seidel across matrix sizes n ∈ {50, 100, 200, 500, 1000}. Includes log-log plots and stability analysis on Hilbert matrices vs random SPD matrices. See `part3/analysis.ipynb`. +Present only if activated during Sprint 3 planning. Compares Gaussian elimination, SVD-based solver, and Gauss-Seidel across matrix sizes n ∈ {50, 100, 200, 500, 1000}. Includes log-log plots and stability analysis on Hilbert matrices vs random SPD matrices. See `part3/analysis.ipynb`.-So sánh các phương pháp giải Ax = b: Gauss, QR, Gauss-Seidel. Thực nghiệm với n ∈ {50, 100, 200, 500, 1000}. Đồ thị log-log, phân tích ma trận Hilbert. Chỉ thực hiện nếu có đủ thời gian sau Phần 1 và 2. +So sánh các phương pháp giải Ax = b: Gauss, SVD, Gauss-Seidel. Thực nghiệm với n ∈ {50, 100, 200, 500, 1000}. Đồ thị log-log, phân tích ma trận Hilbert. Chỉ thực hiện nếu có đủ thời gian sau Phần 1 và 2.Also applies to: 245-245
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@README.md` at line 145, Update the README to replace the stale "QR solver" references in Part 3 with "SVD" to match the implementation; specifically change the description mentioning "QR solver" at the sentence that compares solvers (currently referencing Gaussian elimination, QR solver, and Gauss-Seidel) so it reads "SVD solver" (or "SVD-based solver") and similarly replace the other occurrence at line ~245; ensure the text aligns with the actual benchmark function name svd_decompose in part3/benchmark.py and any mentions of QR in the stability/plot descriptions are updated to SVD.
165-168:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorUpdate Manim scene commands to actual scene class names in part2.
The README commands at lines 165-168 reference
QRDecompositionScene,DiagonalizationScene, andLeastSquaresScene, which don't exist in part2/manim_scene.py. These should be replaced with the actual SVD scene classes:SVDIntro,SVDComparisionScene, andSVDApplicationScene. Users following the README will encounter runtime errors.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@README.md` around lines 165 - 168, The README's manim command examples reference non-existent scene classes (QRDecompositionScene, DiagonalizationScene, LeastSquaresScene); update those commands to the actual scene class names defined in part2 (SVDIntro, SVDComparisionScene, SVDApplicationScene) so users run manim with the correct classes (replace each old class token with its corresponding SVD* class in the command examples).
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 14: The TOC entry uses the wrong fragment
"#part-2--qr-decomposition--manim-video" which doesn't match the actual heading
"Part 2 — SVD Decomposition + Manim Video"; update the TOC link to the correct
anchor that matches the heading slug (e.g.
"#part-2--svd-decomposition--manim-video") so the link navigates to the "Part 2
— SVD Decomposition + Manim Video" section.
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 145: Update the README to replace the stale "QR solver" references in
Part 3 with "SVD" to match the implementation; specifically change the
description mentioning "QR solver" at the sentence that compares solvers
(currently referencing Gaussian elimination, QR solver, and Gauss-Seidel) so it
reads "SVD solver" (or "SVD-based solver") and similarly replace the other
occurrence at line ~245; ensure the text aligns with the actual benchmark
function name svd_decompose in part3/benchmark.py and any mentions of QR in the
stability/plot descriptions are updated to SVD.
- Around line 165-168: The README's manim command examples reference
non-existent scene classes (QRDecompositionScene, DiagonalizationScene,
LeastSquaresScene); update those commands to the actual scene class names
defined in part2 (SVDIntro, SVDComparisionScene, SVDApplicationScene) so users
run manim with the correct classes (replace each old class token with its
corresponding SVD* class in the command examples).
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 258: The README has inconsistent method names for Part 3 between English
and Vietnamese (one lists SVD while the other lists QR); pick the canonical set
of solvers you want to present (e.g., Gauss, QR, Gauss-Seidel or Gauss, SVD,
Gauss-Seidel) and make both language sections match: update the English phrasing
that references "QR" and the Vietnamese phrasing that references "SVD" so they
list the same three methods (refer to the Part 3 header and the phrases "SVD",
"QR", "Gauss", "Gauss-Seidel" to locate the text) and ensure the experiment
description (n values and Hilbert matrix note) remains identical in both
languages.
- Around line 52-61: The README's project tree lists separate scene files under
part2/manim/scene_*.py (e.g., scene_intro.py, scene_svd.py, scene_compare.py,
scene_app.py) but the repository actually contains a single
part2/manim_scene.py; update the README.md to reflect the real layout (either
replace the part2/manim/scene_*.py entries with part2/manim_scene.py and its
actual assets, or rename/split the code into the listed scene_*.py files) so the
documented filenames (scene_intro.py, scene_svd.py, scene_compare.py,
scene_app.py, theme.py, manim.cfg, demo_video.mp4) match the repository.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
2 participants
Linked issue
Closes #85
What this PR does
Summary by CodeRabbit