docs: v0.139.0 -- citation backfill batch 19: SRV (issue #164) - #190
Merged
Conversation
Cited all 15 remaining uncited REQ-SRV-* requirements against TC18 §12.9.1's request handling, §12.9.2's seven-tier priority-in-execution ordering, and §12.9.3 Table 26's per-request-type execution procedure. SRV is now 100% cited. Also scoped and rejected PWR (powerstate.c) as a batch candidate: a thin client-side wrapper over already-cited primitives, no distinct TC18 text of its own. Purely additive; no code or test behavior changed. 1028 requirements (unchanged count), 100% traced+tested, 0 cfusa check errors. Signed-off-by: Matt <47545907+SoundMatt@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Phase 2 (issue #164) citation-backfill batch 19: SRV (
server.c's request-storage/admission/priority-scheduling/completion core).Cited all 15 remaining uncited
REQ-SRV-*requirements — SRV is now 100% cited:REQ-SRV-001-003— pre-load-then-drain-on-enable queue (Table 32'sep_enable)REQ-SRV-004-005— multi-request admission/rejection (§12.9.1.1 + Table 5)REQ-SRV-006-008— priority-selection (§12.9.2's seven-tier ordering + safety-tagged persistence, cross-referencing the already-citedREQ-E2E-012/013gate + FIFO tiebreak)REQ-SRV-009-011— completion + trigger-occurrence recording (§12.9.3 Table 26)REQ-SRV-012— chain-predecessor marking (§11.2.2.4)REQ-SRV-013— cancellation (reusing Phase 1's established basis)REQ-SRV-014— watchdog purge (the 0x0F/0x8F watch-dog-overflow rule already used for CMP)REQ-SRV-021— pending-count getter (§12.9.2's "EP request storage" framing)Also records a scoping finding: PWR (
powerstate.c, 15 uncited) was investigated first and rejected as a batch candidate — a thin client-side wrapper over already-cited primitives (ep_wakeup.h + power.h), no distinct TC18 text of its own (same class as MDIO in batch 18).One citation-text error caught and fixed before any edit was written:
rcp_e2e_request_may_execute()was initially attributed toREQ-E2E-014by proximity guess; grep againstsrc/e2e.c's real tags showed it'sREQ-E2E-012/013.Verification
.fusa-reqs.jsonchange; no source/test code touched.cfusa check: 0 errors.cfusa trace --req-coverage 100 --sec-tested 100: 100%/100%..fusa-reqs.jsonJSON-validated.Ref: issue #164.