Skip to content

Clarify active stress comment wording in Integrator predictor - #611

Draft
dseyler with Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-code-for-review-comment-610
Draft

Clarify active stress comment wording in Integrator predictor#611
dseyler with Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-code-for-review-comment-610

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This addresses a single PR review comment requesting an exact wording fix in Integrator.cpp. The intent is to correct grammar and make the comment read as “active stress model” without changing behavior.

  • Targeted review-comment update

    • Updated one inline comment in Code/Source/solver/Integrator.cpp to replace “active stres/active stress” phrasing with clearer wording: “an active stress model is enabled.”
    • No logic or control-flow changes.
  • Scope

    • Change is limited to the referenced review comment location (discussion_r3824124204) and does not touch other review threads.
// through all domains of all equations until we find one for which an active
// stress model is enabled.

Co-authored-by: dseyler <43078283+dseyler@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fix code based on review comment 610 Clarify active stress comment wording in Integrator predictor Aug 20, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from dseyler August 20, 2026 19:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants