Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [Performance] Eliminate intermediate array allocations in tourism markers#728

Open
ClarusIubar wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-naver-map-allocation-optimization-7550674703007629157
Open

⚡ Bolt: [Performance] Eliminate intermediate array allocations in tourism markers#728
ClarusIubar wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-naver-map-allocation-optimization-7550674703007629157

Conversation

@ClarusIubar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Refactored useNaverTourismMarkers.ts to replace multiple chained .map(), .filter(), and ...spread operations with highly efficient for loops.

🎯 Why: During rapid map panning, the hook rebuilt arrays of visible markers constantly. By creating numerous intermediate arrays for signatures, ID sets, and batched operation arrays, it created immense garbage collection (GC) pressure, which can cause micro-stutters during map interactions.

📊 Impact: Reduces memory allocations for the tourism layer reconciliation to near-zero intermediate arrays (O(1) temporary allocation vs O(N) multiplied by ~7 passes previously).

🔬 Measurement: Verifiable via memory allocation profiles in Chrome DevTools during continuous map panning across KTO tourism spots. Code correctness verified via npm run typecheck and npm run test:all.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 7550674703007629157 started by @ClarusIubar

Consolidated derived state and operations building into single passes using for loops to reduce garbage collection overhead during map panning.

Co-authored-by: ClarusIubar <101549899+ClarusIubar@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant