Conversation
Member
Author
|
@giannipetrella This is a Claude-assisted implementation of Raf's smoothness check. Let's review this carefully, and then we have another very useful feature ready. |
The Groebner computation over the quasiprimitive cycle traces cuts out a variety that can strictly contain the nullcone; the socle recursion of Goesmann--Reineke (doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2026.020) is exact and much faster.
The quasiprimitive cycle traces do not generate the ring of invariants, so the criterion is unreliable, and infeasible on the settings where it is not. A classification-based check (Bocklandt for symmetric settings, Joo for thin ones, Le Bruyn--Teranishi for matrix invariants) can replace it later.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implements the reduction algorithm of Bocklandt (MR1929191) and the classification of cofree quiver settings by Bocklandt and Van de Weyer (doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2007.08.019), and uses them for the geometry of moduli spaces:
strongly_connected_componentsfor quivers,bocklandt_reductionandis_coregularfor quiver settings, with every reduction step documented against the paper,is_smoothfor moduli spaces with properly semistable representations, by checking coregularity of the local quiver setting of every Luna type (MR1972892),codimension_singular_locusfor moduli spaces, as the singular locus is a union of Luna strata,is_cofreefor quiver settings, via wedging, prime components and the classification lists,nullcone_motive,dimension_nullconeanddefect: the motive of the nullcone is a polynomial in the Lefschetz motive, computed by the socle recursion of Gösmann--Reineke (doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2026.020); cofree = coregular + zero defect (Popov) is verified on 100 settings in the test suite,fibre_dimension,is_flatandis_semismallfor projections to walls, computed through nilpotent semistable moduli of local quiver settings; the source stability parameter is required to be King-normalized.Tests include the ten nodes of the Segre cubic, the accidental isomorphism to Gr(2, 4) for the 6-subspace quiver on a wall together with its fibre dimensions and semismallness, and P^5 for the 3-Kronecker quiver with d = (2, 2) and d = (2, 4).