chore: gitignore .foglamp and configure scan

[ngoiyaeric]

Configured the QCX codebase architecture scan mapping of models, tools, and integrations, and published it to foglamp.dev. Verified that .foglamp is successfully ignored.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 5442431678675155157 started by @ngoiyaeric

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Excluded Foglamp architecture scan outputs from version control.

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[qodo-code-review]

Qodo reviews are paused for this user.

Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more →

On a Teams plan?
Reviews resume once this user has a paid seat and their Git account is linked in Qodo.
Link Git account →

Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center?
These require an Enterprise plan - Contact us
Contact us →

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
qcx	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 18, 2026 8:53am

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: bcf3c7e0-3379-4d9c-8f76-376c5ee085a7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a894c0 and 5921836.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .gitignore

📜 Recent review details

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.gitignore (1)

65-67: LGTM!

---

Walkthrough

The .gitignore file adds a dedicated foglamp architecture scan section that excludes the /.foglamp/ directory from version control.

Changes

Foglamp Ignore Configuration

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Ignore foglamp scan outputs .gitignore	Adds an ignore rule for the /.foglamp/ directory.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Poem

I’m a bunny with a tidy lair,
Foglamp files stay out of there.
A little rule, so neat and bright,
Keeps scan crumbs hidden from sight.
Hop, hop—clean repo delight!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly reflects the main changes: ignoring .foglamp and configuring the scan.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch jules-5442431678675155157-18e6c164

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[charliecreates]

Reviewed the root-anchored /.foglamp/ ignore rule at this head. It matches the generated scan directory described by the PR, and I found no blocking correctness, security, or compatibility issues.