Fix NOQA not added to long imports in several output paths

[urayoru113]

Fix NOQA not added to long imports in several output paths

In NOQA wrap mode (multi_line_output=7) isort appends `# NOQA` to
imports that cannot fit on one line. Several import output paths
bypassed `wrap.line()` or called it before comments were attached,
so the line-length check never saw the full line and `# NOQA` was
not added.

Four paths were affected:

1. force_single_line as-imports (L404-432): `with_comments()` wrapped
   `wrap.line(...)` instead of the reverse, so comments were attached
   after the length check. Swap the order to `wrap.line(with_comments(...))`.

   Before (line_length=40):
     from m import func as alias  # type: ignore
   After:
     from m import func as alias  # type: ignore  # NOQA

2. as-imports with opening-line comments + use_parentheses (L523-528):
   `wrap.line()` ran on the import without opening comments, then
   comments were appended afterward. Re-run `wrap.line()` in NOQA mode
   after the comment is attached.

   Before (line_length=40):
     from m import func as alias  # type: ignore  # pylint: disable=...
   After:
     from m import func as alias  # type: ignore  # pylint: disable=...  # NOQA

3. combine_straight_imports (L725-736): the combined line was appended
   directly without going through `wrap.line()`. Route it through
   `wrap.line()`.

   Before (line_length=40):
     import a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p
   After:
     import a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p  # NOQA

4. straight imports (L755-767): each import was emitted via a generator
   that only called `with_comments()`, never `wrap.line()`. Convert to
   an explicit loop and wrap each line with `wrap.line()` only in NOQA
   mode, to avoid changing wrapping behaviour in other modes.

   Before (line_length=40):
     import aaaa...long...module as bbbb...long...alias
   After:
     import aaaa...long...module as bbbb...long...alias  # NOQA

Fixes #2093.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 99.09%. Comparing base (0740d0c) to head (627bf42).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2568      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.16%   99.09%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        3101     3106       +5     
  Branches      671      673       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         3075     3078       +3     
- Misses         14       15       +1     
- Partials       12       13       +1     

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[DanielNoord]

@urayoru113 Could you fix CI please?

[urayoru113]

@DanielNoord I've already fix the CI problem. Ready for another review. Thanks!