Skip to content

Review possible WAM paper: Faster-WAM: Do World Action Models Need Deep Action Modules? - #86

Open
279object wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
robot/add-2608.02365
Open

Review possible WAM paper: Faster-WAM: Do World Action Models Need Deep Action Modules?#86
279object wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
robot/add-2608.02365

Conversation

@279object

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Paper

  • Title: Faster-WAM: Do World Action Models Need Deep Action Modules?
  • Short name: Faster-WAM
  • arXiv ID: 2608.02365v1
  • Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.02365
  • Authors: Liheng Ma, Rui Heng Yang, Zhanguang Zhang, Mateo Clemente, Ziwen Hu, Tongtong Cao, Yingxue Zhang
  • Published: 2026-08-03
  • arXiv categories: cs.AI, cs.LG, cs.RO
  • Matched keywords: WAM, world action model, world action models

README Entry

- **Faster-WAM**: "Faster-WAM: Do World Action Models Need Deep Action Modules?", arXiv 2026. ![](https://img.shields.io/badge/Needs--Taxonomy--Review-64748b)
  [[📄 Paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.02365)]

Robot Decision

Reason

LLM WAM detection failed: Remote end closed connection without response

Evidence

  • WAM
  • world action model
  • world action models

Needs taxonomy review: fallback README heading/badge was used because taxonomy.toml has no README mapping for this classification.

Human Review Checklist

  • This paper belongs in the WAM survey
  • README section is correct
  • Badges are correct
  • Short name is correct
  • Paper link is correct
  • Merge this PR if accepted

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant