Nominate @illdefined

[snaakey]

I would like to nominate @illdefined for commit access. They have been very actively contributing and are trying to push things forward.

Stats:

• 113 PRs merged
• 168 PRs reviewed

[pilz0]

i agree with emily!

[pbsds]

There is currently no active commit bit delegation nor nixpkgs core team, so this application will unfortunately have to sit for a bit until we get our procedures in order. In the meanwhile, I updated the old committer-progress.sh with more queries:

	#	# excluding @r-ryantm
PRs authored	144	N/A
PRs authored & merged	113	N/A
PRs reviewed	177	133
PRs otherwise commented	46	35
PRs otherwise involved	61	41
Issues authored	1	N/A
Issues otherwise commented	12	N/A
Issues otherwise involved	7	N/A

^{Generated with https://gist.github.com/pbsds/7af827a53c103cd3d40902f9b0b21843.}

[isabelroses]

good interaction with them. would be happy to see them with a commit bit

[Fuxmoder]

only good contributions from @illdefined, i approve this

[jemand771]

I know it's a bit hypocritical because I've done the exact thing in the past¹, but @LennyPenny @derf @katjakwast, would you mind (very briefly) commenting the reason for your 👎 reactions? drive-by downvotes aren't helpful and generally suck for the nominee²

Footnotes

1. Source of my newfound empathy: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs-committers/pull/103#issuecomment-4133563079 ↩

2. i.e. leaves room for speculation: "Do they think I'm not good enough, do they just not like me, was this a missclick, ...?" ↩

[piegamesde]

I can't speak for others, but I know that illdefined is not on best personal terms with quite a few people, because of things that happened mostly outside of NixOS, but there is always overlap between communities