fix (dpf/bf4): Remove unsupport parameter HIDE_PORT2_PF from bf4 flavor#3538
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughBF4 flavor construction now uses a dedicated NVConfig builder. The BF4 parameter set omits the unsupported ChangesBF4 NVConfig defaults
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@crates/dpf/src/flavor.rs`:
- Around line 369-371: Update the default_nvconfig_shape test to expect 15
parameters instead of 16, assert that LINK_TYPE_P1=ETH and LINK_TYPE_P2=ETH are
present, and assert that HIDE_PORT2_PF is absent.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: 93146c47-3c8e-4c08-8d41-a8c04339bc63
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
crates/dpf/src/flavor.rs
eb8adc5 to
6a45cc0
Compare
6a45cc0 to
3a57807
Compare
🔍 Container Scan Summary
Per-CVE detail lives in the per-service |
Remove unsupport parameter HIDE_PORT2_PF from bf4 flavor
Related issues
Type of Change
Breaking Changes
Testing
Additional Notes