test: verify opencode GitHub bot with Kimi Code Plan

[Million-mo]

Summary

Test PR to trigger the opencode.yml workflow and verify the OpenCode GitHub bot integration with Kimi Code Plan.

What this PR does

• Adds OPENCODE_BOT_TEST.md — a documentation file describing the OpenCode bot triggers and usage.

Expected bot behavior

1. Auto review: The review job in opencode.yml should trigger automatically on PR open.
2. The bot should leave a code review comment using the kimi-for-coding model (Kimi K2.7 Code).

Checklist

• Workflow file exists on develop/agentic
• KIMI_API_KEY secret configured
• OpenCode GitHub App installed on this repo
• Bot successfully reviews this PR

This is a test-only PR. Safe to close after verification.

[github-actions]

PR Review

Scope Note

This PR contains only a Markdown documentation file (OPENCODE_BOT_TEST.md). As such, the requested focus areas — Python type safety, async correctness, and test coverage — do not apply to this change.

Code Quality

• The Markdown file is well-structured with a clear heading, overview, trigger table, and usage examples.
• No broken links or obvious typos.
• The formatting is consistent.

Potential Bugs

• None identified. This is a non-executable documentation file.

Suggestions for Improvement

1. Permanent home for the guide: If this document is intended to remain, consider moving it to docs/ or renaming it to avoid the _TEST suffix. If it is only a temporary test artifact, consider adding a note at the top clarifying it is temporary.
2. Trigger accuracy: The table says pull_request triggers on “open/sync/reopen”. The actual workflow may be configured for opened, synchronize, and reopened activity types; this wording is fine but could be aligned with the workflow file if exactness matters.
3. Model detail: The note “256K (Andante tier)” is provider-specific. If this is a public repo, consider linking to official Kimi/OpenCode documentation so the context length claim stays accurate.
4. Remove or keep: Line 49 mentions “Remove or keep as documentation.” If you intend to keep it, remove the ambiguity; if not, remove the file after verification.

Verdict

Approve with minor suggestions. This is a safe, test-only documentation change. No code changes to review.

opencode session  |  github run

[Million-mo]

/oc

[github-actions]

Summary

PR: test: verify opencode GitHub bot with Kimi Code Plan

What changed

• Added a single new file: OPENCODE_BOT_TEST.md (+49 lines)
• The file documents OpenCode bot triggers and usage.

Review outcome

• The OpenCode bot (via github-actions) left a review comment.
• Verdict: Approve with minor suggestions.
• The reviewer noted the PR is only a Markdown doc file, so code-specific checks (Python type safety, async correctness, test coverage) did not apply.

Key suggestions from the bot

1. Consider moving the file to docs/ or removing the _TEST suffix if it is meant to stay; otherwise clarify it is temporary.
2. The trigger wording is acceptable but could be aligned with the actual workflow file.
3. The model/context-length note is provider-specific; link to official docs if this is a public repo.
4. Resolve the ambiguity in line 49 about whether to remove or keep the file.

Bot behavior status

• The auto-review workflow did trigger and the bot successfully posted a review comment using the kimi-for-coding model, as indicated by the attached OpenCode session link.

opencode session  |  github run

[Million-mo]

/oc test

[opencode-agent]

Test command received. The PR only adds OPENCODE_BOT_TEST.md, so there is no executable code to test. The OpenCode bot integration appears to be working — it successfully posted a review comment via kimi-for-coding in the earlier workflow run.

opencode session  |  github run

[opencode-agent]

User opencode-agent[bot] does not have write permissions

github run

[Million-mo]

/oc test again

[github-actions]

Test command received again. This PR only adds OPENCODE_BOT_TEST.md, so there is no executable code to test. The OpenCode bot integration remains responsive — it received your /oc command and processed it via the kimi-for-coding model.

opencode session  |  github run

[Million-mo]

/oc code review，是否能发现有什么改进的地方吗

[github-actions]

Code Review: OPENCODE_BOT_TEST.md

这个文件整体结构清晰，但作为测试产物或文档，有以下几个可以改进的地方：

1. 明确文件性质（高优先级）

第 49 行的表述：

This file is a test artifact. Remove or keep as documentation.

存在歧义。建议改为明确的说明，例如：

> **Status**: Test artifact. This file is intended for temporary verification only 
> and should be removed once the OpenCode bot integration is confirmed working.

如果希望保留为正式文档，则应重命名（去掉 _TEST 后缀）并移动到 docs/ 目录下。

2. 触发器描述不够精确

第 15 行：

Auto on PR open/sync/reopen

sync 不是 GitHub Actions 的标准术语，建议与 workflow 文件保持一致：

Auto on `opened`, `synchronize`, `reopened`

3. Model 信息可能过时或过于具体

第 23 行：

Context: 256K (Andante tier)

"Andante tier" 是 provider-specific 的计费/层级信息，容易随时间变化。建议：

- **Context**: 256K (see [Kimi/OpenCode docs](https://...))

或者直接省略 tier 信息，只保留 context 长度。

4. 缺少权限/错误处理说明

从 PR 评论中可以看到出现过：

User opencode-agent[bot] does not have write permissions

如果这份文件要作为文档保留，建议补充一个 Permissions 或 Troubleshooting 章节，说明 bot 需要 pull-requests: write 等权限。

5. 示例命令格式可补充

第 36 行：

/oc fix the typo in the README

建议说明是否需要新行单独写命令，以及是否支持多行指令，例如：

Comment on any issue or PR with a single line starting with `/oc`:

6. 建议的修改后版本

# OpenCode Bot Testing Guide

> **Status**: Temporary test artifact. Remove after the OpenCode GitHub bot integration is verified.

## Overview

The `opencode.yml` workflow integrates [OpenCode](https://opencode.ai) with this repository.
It uses the `kimi-for-coding` provider as the LLM backend.

## Triggers

| Event | Trigger | Use Case |
|-------|---------|----------|
| `pull_request` | Auto on `opened`, `synchronize`, `reopened` | Automated code review |
| `issue_comment` | `/oc` or `/opencode` in a comment | Manual task on issue/PR |
| `pull_request_review_comment` | `/oc` on a PR diff line | Targeted code feedback |

## Model

- **Provider**: `kimi-for-coding`
- **Model**: `kimi-for-coding` (Kimi K2.7 Code)
- **Context**: 256K

## Usage Examples

### Auto Review

Open a PR targeting `develop/agentic`. The bot reviews automatically.

### Manual Fix

Add a comment on any issue or PR:

```text
/oc fix the typo in the README

Inline Code Review

In the PR Files changed tab, comment on a specific line:

/oc add error handling here

Notes

This file is used only to verify the OpenCode bot integration.
Once verified, it should be removed or replaced with official documentation in docs/.

### 总体评价
**Approve with suggestions**。这是一个安全的测试文档 PR，没有代码变更。主要改进方向是明确文件性质、统一术语、避免 provider-specific 的过时信息。

<a href="https://opencode.ai/s/D6GRkydO"><img width="200" alt="New%20session%20-%202026-07-23T06%3A32%3A58.051Z" src="https://social-cards.sst.dev/opencode-share/TmV3IHNlc3Npb24gLSAyMDI2LTA3LTIzVDA2OjMyOjU4LjA1MVo=.png?model=kimi-for-coding/kimi-for-coding&version=1.18.4&id=D6GRkydO" /></a>
[opencode session](https://opencode.ai/s/D6GRkydO)&nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;[github run](/Million-mo/agentpool/actions/runs/29985369933)

[Million-mo]

/oc verify workflow update

[github-actions]

Workflow Verification

No workflow file changes in this PR. The diff only adds OPENCODE_BOT_TEST.md (+49 lines). The opencode.yml workflow itself is assumed to already exist on develop/agentic.

Verified behavior

Check	Status
Auto-review on PR open	✅ Triggered and posted review comment
Uses kimi-for-coding model	✅ Confirmed in session cards / comments
/oc command handling	✅ Responsive to /oc, /oc test, /oc test again, /oc code review
Review quality	✅ Provided structured feedback with suggestions

Issue observed

One workflow run failed with:

User opencode-agent[bot] does not have write permissions

This is a permissions issue, not a workflow syntax issue. If you want the bot to post comments/reviews or push fixes, ensure the workflow job has:

permissions:
  pull-requests: write
  contents: write        # only if /oc fix should push commits
  issues: write          # if /oc is used on issues

Recommendation

If the goal is to test/merge this PR:

• The bot integration is verified and working.
• The PR is safe to close as a test-only change, or keep OPENCODE_BOT_TEST.md as temporary documentation.
• If you want to keep the doc, address the bot’s suggestions (remove _TEST suffix / move to docs/, clarify temporary status, align trigger wording with opencode.yml).

opencode session  |  github run