feat(perps): add write-perps-ticket product-authoring skill#58
Merged
Conversation
The PM-side first pass that pairs with breakdown-perps-tickets: authors one clean bug/EPIC/initiative ticket stating intent and expected outcome, with no implementation or layer routing. - Typed modes (bug | epic | initiative), each with its own tight format - Intent-not-implementation principle: testable outcomes, no file paths, no repo/component routing (that is the engineer breakdown pass) - Surfacing section (severity, area label, correct type) so reported bugs get triaged instead of lost in the backlog - Hands off to breakdown-perps-tickets; reuses domains/perps/knowledge
michalconsensys
approved these changes
Jun 29, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Adds
write-perps-ticket— the product (first) pass that pairs withbreakdown-perps-tickets(#57, the engineering pass). It helps a PM (or a Claude acting for one) turn a raw observation/idea/goal into one clean, complete ticket that states intent and expected outcome, then stops before implementation.Splits the two jobs the team actually has (per the product discussion): the PM describes what's broken / expected with no implementation, and engineering does the technical split + layer routing as a second pass.
Modes
Typed, each with its own tight format:
Why these choices
breakdown-perps-tickets. Both reusedomains/perps/knowledge/*.Relation to #57
Complementary, not dependent. #57 = engineer split/route; this = PM authoring. Merge order doesn't matter.