docs(security): state response-time SLA in the security issue template - #1149
Conversation
Note on the failing CI checksThe red checks here are pre-existing on
This PR changes only Markdown, so it cannot affect any of those jobs — a docs edit does not change Happy to open a separate PR fixing the |
7e5361c to
5476e11
Compare
ogazboiz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the three timeline bullets match SECURITY.md's response timeline exactly, no numbers invented, and thanks for the sharp CI triage comment on the red window. merging. non-blocking: the relative SECURITY.md link will not resolve inside filed issue bodies, an absolute URL in a follow-up would be nice. if you want to keep contributing, join us on Telegram: https://t.me/+DOylgFv1jyJlNzM0
Closes #1091
Problem
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security.mdtold reporters how to file, but not how long they would wait for a reply.SECURITY.mdalready had a Response Timeline section (48h / 7d / 30d) — the template just never surfaced it, so a researcher deciding between reporting and waiting had to go find it.Changes
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security.md— a "What to expect" section above the report fields, restating the three targets verbatim fromSECURITY.mdand linking toSECURITY.md#response-timeline, plus what to do if 48 hours pass with no reply.SECURITY.md— two edits to keep the documents from contradicting each other:Cross-check
The three bullets are byte-identical between the two files, including capitalisation:
No timeline numbers were invented or changed — the template adopts what
SECURITY.mdalready committed to.Out of scope
No bug bounty program, no SLA-tracking automation.