Skip to content

Issue 1051: Fix up audit comments for cross-type imports and updates that update storage data#7579

Merged
labkey-susanh merged 3 commits intorelease26.3-SNAPSHOTfrom
26.3_fb_crossTypeStorageAuditComments
Apr 14, 2026
Merged

Issue 1051: Fix up audit comments for cross-type imports and updates that update storage data#7579
labkey-susanh merged 3 commits intorelease26.3-SNAPSHOTfrom
26.3_fb_crossTypeStorageAuditComments

Conversation

@labkey-susanh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@labkey-susanh labkey-susanh commented Apr 13, 2026

Rationale

Issue 1051: Because we support the use of a special column (StorageComment) for adding audit comments about storage actions on a per-line basis during file import, we update the audit comment in the data iterator context to override any comment provided at the file level. This works just fine when doing a single-type or single-container import but when doing a cross-type or cross-container import, the file-level comment is lost after the first file of samples is processed.

Related Pull Requests

Changes

  • Write the StorageComment field to the split files for a cross-type or cross-container import

@labkey-susanh labkey-susanh requested a review from cnathe April 14, 2026 15:19
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cnathe cnathe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code reviewed. Note: manual testing completed for the 26.4 version of this PR.

@labkey-susanh labkey-susanh merged commit 689a835 into release26.3-SNAPSHOT Apr 14, 2026
12 checks passed
@labkey-susanh labkey-susanh deleted the 26.3_fb_crossTypeStorageAuditComments branch April 14, 2026 21:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants