🔒 [security fix] Fix Predictable Jitter in Retry Queue#1220
Conversation
🎯 What: Replaced insecure \`Math.random()\` with \`crypto.getRandomValues()\` for calculating network jitter.⚠️ Risk: Predictable jitter could allow attackers to predict retry intervals, potentially leading to race conditions or facilitating denial-of-service (DoS) attacks by synchronizing malicious requests with retry attempts. 🛡️ Solution: Used a cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator to generate a random float between 0 and 1, matching the expected output range of \`Math.random()\`.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
🔒 Release Safety Check Results✅ Safety Checks Passed {"code":"NOT_FOUND","message":"Requested function was not found"} |
🔍 Classification Check Results
✅ No violations detected. Safe to merge! |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 394a4ce0ac
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| const jitterAmount = delay * 0.1; // 10% jitter | ||
| delay += (Math.random() * 2 - 1) * jitterAmount; | ||
| delay += | ||
| ((crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint32Array(1))[0]! / (0xffffffff + 1)) * 2 - 1) * |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When this package is consumed through @settler/adapters, packages/adapters/package.json points main at dist/index.js, and that exported connector-runtime instantiates the tracked dist/retry-queue/retry-queue.js. This commit updates only the TypeScript source, while the checked-in dist file still computes jitter with Math.random(), so any install or deployment that uses the packaged artifact without rebuilding keeps the predictable jitter path and the security fix is ineffective.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
Closed during PR cleanup: mergeable=UNKNOWN base=main. Reopen only with a current verified change. |
1 participant
🎯 What: Replaced insecure
Math.random()withcrypto.getRandomValues()for calculating network jitter inpackages/adapters/src/retry-queue/retry-queue.ts.🛡️ Solution: Used a cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator to generate a random float between 0 and 1, matching the expected output range of
Math.random(). The random integer fromcrypto.getRandomValueswas scaled properly to maintain the original logic's requirements.PR created automatically by Jules for task 10780907734178143452 started by @Hardonian