Skip to content

fix: 🛡️ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix Weak Hashing Algorithm (SHA256 without salt)#206

Merged
Hardonian merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
jules-fix-credential-hash-7495761229841664717
May 29, 2026
Merged

fix: 🛡️ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix Weak Hashing Algorithm (SHA256 without salt)#206
Hardonian merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
jules-fix-credential-hash-7495761229841664717

Conversation

@Hardonian

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 What

The hashCredential function previously used an unsalted SHA-256 algorithm to hash credentials, which is insecure and vulnerable to rainbow table attacks and brute-forcing.

⚠️ Risk

If an attacker gains access to the local sandbox state or the registry payload where these hashes are stored, they could rapidly compute plaintexts using hardware acceleration or pre-computed hash tables, compromising the messaging bridge tokens or router credentials.

🛡️ Solution

  • Migrated the hashing implementation to use Node.js's native crypto.scryptSync with a random 16-byte salt per hash.
  • Implemented verifyCredential using crypto.timingSafeEqual to securely compare plaintexts against stored salted hashes.
  • Retained a fallback in verifyCredential to support legacy, unsalted SHA-256 hashes for backwards compatibility with existing active deployments.
  • Updated conflict detection logic to pass plaintexts safely for in-memory resolution where strict equality checks on hashes are mathematically impossible with distinct salts.

Signed-off-by: Jules jules@nemo.claw


PR created automatically by Jules for task 7495761229841664717 started by @Hardonian

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3ed482260f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/lib/security/credential-hash.ts
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This repository limits contributors to 10 open pull requests. Please close or merge existing PRs before opening new ones.

@github-actions github-actions Bot closed this May 29, 2026
@kilo-code-bot

kilo-code-bot Bot commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Kilo Code Review could not run — your account is out of credits.

Add credits or switch to a free model to enable reviews on this change.

@Hardonian Hardonian reopened this May 29, 2026
@Hardonian
Hardonian merged commit 85f6202 into main May 29, 2026
6 of 12 checks passed
@Hardonian
Hardonian deleted the jules-fix-credential-hash-7495761229841664717 branch May 29, 2026 05:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant