test: 🧪 improve test coverage for stripAnsi#200
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
This repository limits contributors to 10 open pull requests. Please close or merge existing PRs before opening new ones. |
|
Kilo Code Review could not run — your account is out of credits. Add credits or switch to a free model to enable reviews on this change. |
🎯 What: The function
stripAnsiinsrc/lib/adapters/openshell/client.tslacked comprehensive tests. Only a single happy-path string was tested. We expanded the tests to cover various scenarios.📊 Coverage: The tests now cover:
undefinedand fallback parameter handling✨ Result: Test coverage for this pure string manipulation function is now comprehensive and robust against regressions.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 16994478144479514036 started by @Hardonian