Skip to content

Harden peer-review navigation, reader experience, and citation paths - #2

Merged
GoGoKo699 merged 16 commits into
mainfrom
audit/peer-review-reader-discoverability
Aug 25, 2026
Merged

Harden peer-review navigation, reader experience, and citation paths#2
GoGoKo699 merged 16 commits into
mainfrom
audit/peer-review-reader-discoverability

Conversation

@GoGoKo699

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Purpose

This is a repository-facing sanity pass for peer-review use, first-time readers, and future citation.

Changes

  • disambiguate the prospectively frozen internal confirmation from an external replication;
  • map the implementation name problem_tree explicitly to the documented maximum-|J| tree (MAXJ);
  • add the classical Chow–Liu tree-approximation boundary and explain why MAXJ is not a KL-optimality claim;
  • make reproduction commands root-relative in all study entry points;
  • add citation sections to the primary experiment and every supporting-study README;
  • distinguish citation of the primary v1.0.0 result from the expanded Version 1.1.0 archive;
  • refresh the stale packaged repository-validation record to include all five scientific validators;
  • add regression tests for deep citation routes, terminology, and validation-record freshness.

Scientific scope

No numerical result, frozen source file, primary comparison, effect estimate, or interpretation boundary is changed.

Remaining release action

The repository already has release v1.0.0 for the primary confirmed result. Version 1.1.0 citation guidance now requires either a matching release tag when one is published or the full commit SHA, so citations remain unambiguous in either case.

@GoGoKo699
GoGoKo699 merged commit 92aa0ca into main Aug 25, 2026
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant