https://www.coursera.org/learn/sql-for-data-science/home/welcome
https://www.coursera.org/learn/sql-for-data-science/supplement/VSJ29/yelp-dataset-sql-lookup
Data Scientist Role Play: Profiling and Analyzing the Yelp Dataset Coursera Worksheet
This is a 2-part assignment. In the first part, you are asked a series of questions that will help you profile and understand the data just like a data scientist would. For this first part of the assignment, you will be assessed both on the correctness of your findings, as well as the code you used to arrive at your answer. You will be graded on how easy your code is to read, so remember to use proper formatting and comments where necessary.
In the second part of the assignment, you are asked to come up with your own inferences and analysis of the data for a particular research question you want to answer. You will be required to prepare the dataset for the analysis you choose to do. As with the first part, you will be graded, in part, on how easy your code is to read, so use proper formatting and comments to illustrate and communicate your intent as required.
For both parts of this assignment, use this "worksheet." It provides all the questions you are being asked, and your job will be to transfer your answers and SQL coding where indicated into this worksheet so that your peers can review your work. You should be able to use any Text Editor (Windows Notepad, Apple TextEdit, Notepad ++, Sublime Text, etc.) to copy and paste your answers. If you are going to use Word or some other page layout application, just be careful to make sure your answers and code are lined appropriately. In this case, you may want to save as a PDF to ensure your formatting remains intact for you reviewer.
i. Attribute table = 10000
ii. Business table = 10000
iii. Category table = 10000
iv. Checkin table = 10000
v. elite_years table = 10000
vi. friend table = 10000
vii. hours table = 10000
viii. photo table = 10000
ix. review table = 10000
x. tip table = 10000
xi. user table = 10000
SELECT
COUNT(*)
FROM
table 2. Find the total distinct records by either the foreign key or primary key for each table. If two foreign keys are listed in the table, please specify which foreign key.
i. Business = ID 10000
ii. Hours = business_id 1562
iii. Category = business_id 2643
iv. Attribute = business_id 1115
v. Review = id 10000
vi. Checkin = business_id 493
vii. Photo = id 10000
viii. Tip = business_id 3979, user_id 537
ix. User = id 10000
x. Friend = user_id 11
xi. Elite_years = user_id 2780
*Note: Primary Keys are denoted in the ER-Diagram with a yellow key icon.
SELECT
COUNT(distinct key_id)
FROM
table Answer: No
SQL code used to arrive at answer:
SELECT
*
FROM
user
WHERE
id IS NULL
OR name IS NULL
OR review_count IS NULL
OR yelping_since IS NULL
OR useful IS NULL
OR funny IS NULL
OR cool IS NULL
OR fans IS NULL
OR average_stars IS NULL
OR compliment_hot IS NULL
OR compliment_more IS NULL
OR compliment_profile IS NULL
OR compliment_cute IS NULL
OR compliment_list IS NULL
OR compliment_note IS NULL
OR compliment_plain IS NULL
OR compliment_cool IS NULL
OR compliment_funny IS NULL
OR compliment_writer IS NULL
OR compliment_photos IS NULL-Será tudo isso mesmo?
4. For each table and column listed below, display the smallest (minimum), largest (maximum), and average (mean) value for the following fields:
i. Table: Review, Column: Stars
min: 1 max: 5 avg: 3.7082
ii. Table: Business, Column: Stars
min: 1.0 max: 5.0 avg: 3.6549
iii. Table: Tip, Column: Likes
min: 0 max: 2 avg: 0.0144
iv. Table: Checkin, Column: Count
min: 1 max: 53 avg: 1.9414
v. Table: User, Column: Review_count
min: 0 max: 2000 avg: 24.2995
SELECT
MIN(Column), MAX(Column), AVG(Column)
FROM
table SQL code used to arrive at answer:
SELECT
city,
SUM(review_count) AS total_reviews
FROM
Business
GROUP BY
city
ORDER BY
total_reviews DESCCopy and Paste the Result Below:
| city | total_reviews |
|---|---|
| Las Vegas | 82854 |
| Phoenix | 34503 |
| Toronto | 24113 |
| Scottsdale | 20614 |
| Charlotte | 12523 |
| Henderson | 10871 |
| Tempe | 10504 |
| Pittsburgh | 9798 |
| Montréal | 9448 |
| Chandler | 8112 |
| Mesa | 6875 |
| Gilbert | 6380 |
| Cleveland | 5593 |
| Madison | 5265 |
| Glendale | 4406 |
| Mississauga | 3814 |
| Edinburgh | 2792 |
| Peoria | 2624 |
| North Las Vegas | 2438 |
| Markham | 2352 |
| Champaign | 2029 |
| Stuttgart | 1849 |
| Surprise | 1520 |
| Lakewood | 1465 |
| Goodyear | 1155 |
| (Output limit exceeded, 25 of 362 total rows shown) |
i. Avon
SQL code used to arrive at answer:
SELECT
stars,
SUM(review_count) AS total_reviews
FROM
Business
WHERE
city = 'Avon'
GROUP BY
starsCopy and Paste the Resulting Table Below (2 columns – star rating and count):
| stars | total_reviews |
|---|---|
| 1.5 | 10 |
| 2.5 | 6 |
| 3.5 | 88 |
| 4.0 | 21 |
| 4.5 | 31 |
| 5.0 | 3 |
ii. Beachwood
SQL code used to arrive at answer:
SELECT
stars,
SUM(review_count) AS total_reviews
FROM
Business
WHERE
city = 'Beachwood'
GROUP BY
starsCopy and Paste the Resulting Table Below (2 columns - star rating and count):
| stars | total_reviews |
|---|---|
| 2.0 | 8 |
| 2.5 | 3 |
| 3.0 | 11 |
| 3.5 | 6 |
| 4.0 | 69 |
| 4.5 | 17 |
| 5.0 | 23 |
SQL code used to arrive at answer:
SELECT
id,
name,
SUM(review_count) AS total_reviews -- in case of duplicate user
FROM
user
GROUP BY
id -- Some didn´t have name
ORDER BY
total_reviews DESC
LIMIT
3 Copy and Paste the Result Below:
| id | name | total_reviews |
|---|---|---|
| -G7Zkl1wIWBBmD0KRy_sCw | Gerald | 2000 |
| -3s52C4zL_DHRK0ULG6qtg | Sara | 1629 |
| -8lbUNlXVSoXqaRRiHiSNg | Yuri | 1339 |
Please explain your findings and interpretation of the results:
Not really.
Amy, who has the most amount of fans, has only 609 reviews. That is just 30.45% of reviews comparing to Gerald, who has the highest count of reviews and has about half amount of fans (253 fans).
SELECT
id,
name,
SUM(review_count) AS total_reviews,
SUM(fans) AS total_fans
--fans -- it works too as SUM, but let be the SUM just to be sure
FROM
user
GROUP BY
id -- Some didn´t have name
ORDER BY
total_fans DESC| id | name | total_reviews | total_fans |
|---|---|---|---|
| -9I98YbNQnLdAmcYfb324Q | Amy | 609 | 503 |
| -8EnCioUmDygAbsYZmTeRQ | Mimi | 968 | 497 |
| --2vR0DIsmQ6WfcSzKWigw | Harald | 1153 | 311 |
| -G7Zkl1wIWBBmD0KRy_sCw | Gerald | 2000 | 253 |
| -0IiMAZI2SsQ7VmyzJjokQ | Christine | 930 | 173 |
| -g3XIcCb2b-BD0QBCcq2Sw | Lisa | 813 | 159 |
| -9bbDysuiWeo2VShFJJtcw | Cat | 377 | 133 |
| -FZBTkAZEXoP7CYvRV2ZwQ | William | 1215 | 126 |
| -9da1xk7zgnnfO1uTVYGkA | Fran | 862 | 124 |
| -lh59ko3dxChBSZ9U7LfUw | Lissa | 834 | 120 |
| -B-QEUESGWHPE_889WJaeg | Mark | 861 | 115 |
| -DmqnhW4Omr3YhmnigaqHg | Tiffany | 408 | 111 |
| -cv9PPT7IHux7XUc9dOpkg | bernice | 255 | 105 |
| -DFCC64NXgqrxlO8aLU5rg | Roanna | 1039 | 104 |
| -IgKkE8JvYNWeGu8ze4P8Q | Angela | 694 | 101 |
| -K2Tcgh2EKX6e6HqqIrBIQ | .Hon | 1246 | 101 |
| -4viTt9UC44lWCFJwleMNQ | Ben | 307 | 96 |
| -3i9bhfvrM3F1wsC9XIB8g | Linda | 584 | 89 |
| -kLVfaJytOJY2-QdQoCcNQ | Christina | 842 | 85 |
| -ePh4Prox7ZXnEBNGKyUEA | Jessica | 220 | 84 |
| -4BEUkLvHQntN6qPfKJP2w | Greg | 408 | 81 |
| -C-l8EHSLXtZZVfUAUhsPA | Nieves | 178 | 80 |
| -dw8f7FLaUmWR7bfJ_Yf0w | Sui | 754 | 78 |
| -8lbUNlXVSoXqaRRiHiSNg | Yuri | 1339 | 76 |
| -0zEEaDFIjABtPQni0XlHA | Nicole | 161 | 73 |
| (Output limit exceeded, 25 of 10000 total rows shown) |
Answer:
1644 reviews with the word 'LOVE' and 115 reviews with the word 'HATE'.
!!ONE IMPORTANTE THING I noticed is that, if I use '%hate%' it counts the word 'WHATEVER'. So, if I use '% hate%', it excludes this mistake.
Also, if I use '% hate %', it could exclude the cases when the word 'hate' comes followed by comma "," or dot "." and the conjugated verbs ("hated").
The same I did for the word 'love'.
Just out of curiosity: the results with the '%hate%': 232 and with '%love%': 1780.
SQL code used to arrive at answer:
SELECT
COUNT(id) AS total_reviews_LOVE
FROM
review
WHERE
text LIKE '% love%' --with space before the LOVESELECT
COUNT(id) AS total_reviews_HATE
FROM
review
WHERE
text LIKE '% hate%' --with space before HATESQL code used to arrive at answer:
SELECT
id,
name,
fans AS total_fans
FROM
user
ORDER BY
total_fans DESC
LIMIT
10 Copy and Paste the Result Below:
| id | name | total_fans |
|---|---|---|
| -9I98YbNQnLdAmcYfb324Q | Amy | 503 |
| -8EnCioUmDygAbsYZmTeRQ | Mimi | 497 |
| --2vR0DIsmQ6WfcSzKWigw | Harald | 311 |
| -G7Zkl1wIWBBmD0KRy_sCw | Gerald | 253 |
| -0IiMAZI2SsQ7VmyzJjokQ | Christine | 173 |
| -g3XIcCb2b-BD0QBCcq2Sw | Lisa | 159 |
| -9bbDysuiWeo2VShFJJtcw | Cat | 133 |
| -FZBTkAZEXoP7CYvRV2ZwQ | William | 126 |
| -9da1xk7zgnnfO1uTVYGkA | Fran | 124 |
| -lh59ko3dxChBSZ9U7LfUw | Lissa | 120 |
1. Pick one city and category of your choice and group the businesses in that city or category by their overall star rating. Compare the businesses with 2-3 stars to the businesses with 4-5 stars and answer the following questions. Include your code.
Checking the Categories:
SELECT
category,
COUNT(category) AS num
FROM
category
GROUP BY
category
ORDER BY
num DESC| category | num |
|---|---|
| Restaurants | 912 |
| Food | 425 |
| Shopping | 405 |
| Beauty & Spas | 224 |
| Nightlife | 214 |
| Home Services | 203 |
| Health & Medical | 196 |
| Bars | 185 |
| Local Services | 166 |
| Automotive | 163 |
| Active Life | 122 |
| Event Planning & Services | 119 |
| American (Traditional) | 105 |
| Fast Food | 104 |
| Fashion | 98 |
| Coffee & Tea | 92 |
| Sandwiches | 90 |
| Pizza | 89 |
| Arts & Entertainment | 87 |
| Hotels & Travel | 86 |
| Auto Repair | 84 |
| Burgers | 81 |
| Italian | 81 |
| Specialty Food | 79 |
| Hair Salons | 78 |
| (Output limit exceeded, 25 of 712 total rows shown) |
I chose Bars
Checking the cities:
SELECT
city,
state,
COUNT(city) AS num
FROM
business
GROUP BY
city
ORDER BY
num DESCI Chose Toronto
Grouping by stars, it shows only SATURDAY time
| name | city | category | stars | hours | Total_reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Fox & Fiddle | Toronto | Bars | 2.5 | Saturday 10:00-2:00 | 245 |
| The Charlotte Room | Toronto | Bars | 3.5 | Saturday 18:00-2:00 | 60 |
| Halo Brewery | Toronto | Bars | 4.0 | Saturday 11:00-21:00 | 90 |
| Cabin Fever | Toronto | Bars | 4.5 | Saturday 16:00-2:00 | 182 |
It´s interesting grouping by hours.hours
| name | city | category | stars | hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Fox & Fiddle | Toronto | Bars | 2.5 | Friday 11:00-2:00 |
| Halo Brewery | Toronto | Bars | 4.0 | Friday 15:00-21:00 |
| The Charlotte Room | Toronto | Bars | 3.5 | Friday 15:00-2:00 |
| Cabin Fever | Toronto | Bars | 4.5 | Friday 18:00-2:00 |
| The Fox & Fiddle | Toronto | Bars | 2.5 | Monday 11:00-2:00 |
| The Charlotte Room | Toronto | Bars | 3.5 | Monday 15:00-1:00 |
| Cabin Fever | Toronto | Bars | 4.5 | Monday 16:00-2:00 |
| The Fox & Fiddle | Toronto | Bars | 2.5 | Saturday 10:00-2:00 |
| Halo Brewery | Toronto | Bars | 4.0 | Saturday 11:00-21:00 |
| Cabin Fever | Toronto | Bars | 4.5 | Saturday 16:00-2:00 |
| The Charlotte Room | Toronto | Bars | 3.5 | Saturday 18:00-2:00 |
| The Fox & Fiddle | Toronto | Bars | 2.5 | Sunday 10:00-2:00 |
| Halo Brewery | Toronto | Bars | 4.0 | Sunday 11:00-21:00 |
| Cabin Fever | Toronto | Bars | 4.5 | Sunday 16:00-2:00 |
| The Fox & Fiddle | Toronto | Bars | 2.5 | Thursday 11:00-2:00 |
| The Charlotte Room | Toronto | Bars | 3.5 | Thursday 15:00-1:00 |
| Halo Brewery | Toronto | Bars | 4.0 | Thursday 15:00-21:00 |
| Cabin Fever | Toronto | Bars | 4.5 | Thursday 18:00-2:00 |
| The Fox & Fiddle | Toronto | Bars | 2.5 | Tuesday 11:00-2:00 |
| The Charlotte Room | Toronto | Bars | 3.5 | Tuesday 15:00-1:00 |
| Halo Brewery | Toronto | Bars | 4.0 | Tuesday 15:00-21:00 |
| Cabin Fever | Toronto | Bars | 4.5 | Tuesday 18:00-2:00 |
| The Fox & Fiddle | Toronto | Bars | 2.5 | Wednesday 11:00-2:00 |
| The Charlotte Room | Toronto | Bars | 3.5 | Wednesday 15:00-1:00 |
| Halo Brewery | Toronto | Bars | 4.0 | Wednesday 15:00-21:00 |
| (Output limit exceeded, 25 of 26 total rows shown) |
i. Do the two groups you chose to analyze have a different distribution of hours?
The Bars with highest stars open afernoom, when the Bar with the lowest stars points opens before noom, at 11am.
ii. Do the two groups you chose to analyze have a different number of reviews?
The Bars with lowest stars have a bit more reviews than the ones with highest stars
iii. Are you able to infer anything from the location data provided between these two groups? Explain.
The two bars with the best qualification are located on the west side of the city. As we go to the east, the qualification goes down. The bar with the least amount of stars is located on the east art of the city. I used google maps and the longitude\latitude informations to pinpoint the locations and get the image
The Fox & Fiddle, 2.5 stars
The Charlotte Room, 3.5 stars
Halo Brewery, 4.0 stars
Cabin Fever, 4.5 stars
SQL code used for analysis:
SELECT
business.name,
business.city,
category.category,
business.stars,
hours.hours,
sum(business.review_count) as Total_reviews
FROM (business
INNER JOIN
category
ON
business.id = category.business_id)
INNER JOIN
hours
ON
hours.business_id = business.id
WHERE
business.city = 'Toronto'
AND category.category = "Bars"
GROUP BY
business.stars
2. Group business based on the ones that are open and the ones that are closed. What differences can you find between the ones that are still open and the ones that are closed? List at least two differences and the SQL code you used to arrive at your answer.
i. Difference 1:
Comparing on the same category, the ones witch closed have much less total reviews than the ones open.
Well, I could assume that could be a bias:
- As we don't know when the closed ones finished their businesses and since the ones open are still getting reviews.
The closed ones, can not get reviews anymore.
OPEN by category
| Quantity | AvgStrars | totalReviews | category |
|---|---|---|---|
| 53 | 3.45283018868 | 3772 | Restaurants |
| 25 | 4.0 | 945 | Shopping |
| 20 | 3.725 | 1588 | Food |
| 16 | 4.21875 | 198 | Health & Medical |
| 15 | 3.93333333333 | 91 | Home Services |
| 12 | 3.79166666667 | 116 | Beauty & Spas |
| 12 | 3.625 | 952 | Nightlife |
| 11 | 3.63636363636 | 945 | Bars |
| 10 | 4.15 | 131 | Active Life |
| 10 | 4.35 | 94 | Local Services |
| 9 | 4.5 | 198 | Automotive |
| 8 | 3.8125 | 1114 | American (Traditional) |
Closed by category
| Quantity | AvgStrars | totalReviews | category |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 3.47222222222 | 732 | Restaurants |
| 8 | 3.25 | 399 | Nightlife |
| 6 | 3.25 | 377 | Bars |
| 5 | 3.9 | 32 | Shopping |
| 3 | 3.16666666667 | 190 | American (New) |
| 3 | 3.83333333333 | 14 | American (Traditional) |
| 3 | 3.33333333333 | 23 | Event Planning & Services |
| 3 | 4.16666666667 | 193 | Food |
| 2 | 4.25 | 102 | Desserts |
| 2 | 4.0 | 297 | Gluten-Free |
| 2 | 3.5 | 148 | Italian |
| 2 | 3.25 | 8 | Japanese |
SQL code used for analysis:
SELECT
COUNT(business.is_open) AS Quantity,
AVG(business.stars) AS AvgStrars,
SUM(business.review_count) AS totalReviews,
category.category
FROM
business
JOIN
category
ON
category.business_id = business.id
WHERE
business.is_open = 1 --0
GROUP BY
category.category
ORDER BY
Quantity DESC
LIMIT
12ii. Difference 2:
The closed businesses have got much less reviews classified as useful, cool or funny.
| Useful | Funny | Cool | TotalReviews | is_open | Number_businesses | AvgStars |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | 15 | 30 | 9217 | 0 | 71 | 3.54225352113 |
| 484 | 152 | 219 | 175821 | 1 | 565 | 3.7610619469 |
SQL code used for analysis:
SELECT
SUM(useful) AS Useful,
SUM(funny) AS Funny,
SUM(cool) AS Cool,
SUM(business.review_count) AS TotalReviews,
business.is_open,
COUNT(is_open) as Number_businesses,
AVG(business.stars) AS AvgStars
FROM
review
JOIN
business
ON
review.business_id = business.id
GROUP BY
business.is_open NOTES:
| Quantity | is_open |
|---|---|
| 1520 | 0 |
| 8480 | 1 |
SELECT
COUNT(is_open) AS Quantity,
is_open
FROM
business
WHERE
is_open = 0 UNION
SELECT
COUNT(is_open) AS Quantity,
is_open
FROM
business
WHERE
is_open =13. For this last part of your analysis, you are going to choose the type of analysis you want to conduct on the Yelp dataset and are going to prepare the data for analysis.
Ideas for analysis include: Parsing out keywords and business attributes for sentiment analysis, clustering businesses to find commonalities or anomalies between them, predicting the overall star rating for a business, predicting the number of fans a user will have, and so on. These are just a few examples to get you started, so feel free to be creative and come up with your own problem you want to solve. Provide answers, in-line, to all of the following:
i. Indicate the type of analysis you chose to do:
To check which user have given the highest amount of useful reviews and relacionate with the business categories. Try to find the preference of category of this user.
ii. Write 1-2 brief paragraphs on the type of data you will need for your analysis and why you chose that data:
I would need the tables: User, Review, Business and Category.
Check from users the biggest sum of review_count and useful.
Cross the user ID with the review.user_id to get the business_id. Cross it with the business table and the category.
Check if the business is open, the location and its category.
iii. Output of your finished dataset:
The person with the biggest amount of useful reviews in User is not in the Review table.
The person with the biggest amount of useful reviews in the Reviews table, doesn´t have the business in the Business table. Actually, only one business.
iv. Provide the SQL code you used to create your final dataset:
Selecting the users with the most amount of useful reviews.
But they are not in the Review table.
SELECT
name,
SUM(review_count) AS ttl_reviews,
useful,
id
FROM
user
GROUP BY
name
ORDER BY
ttl_reviews DESC
LIMIT
5| name | ttl_reviews | useful | id |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole | 2397 | 0 | -LX8NEl6XNKQlA3cViH8gw |
| Sara | 2253 | 0 | -kmiAt2tKWmH82ta6KQI7Q |
| Gerald | 2034 | 17524 | -G7Zkl1wIWBBmD0KRy_sCw |
| Lisa | 2021 | 0 | -lsC2rT-nb2FftcPGzQGhA |
| Mark | 1945 | 0 | -lUVPiL0NfrwEfD9yuBhlQ |
Then, selecting the users in the Review table with the most amount of useful reviews.
But these ones are not in the User table
SELECT
COUNT(user_id) totalReviews,
user_id,
SUM(useful)
FROM
review
GROUP BY
user_id
ORDER BY
totalReviews DESC
LIMIT
5| totalReviews | user_id | sum(useful) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | CxDOIDnH8gp9KXzpBHJYXw | 19 |
| 7 | U4INQZOPSUaj8hMjLlZ3KA | 43 |
| 5 | 8teQ4Zc9jpl_ffaPJUn6Ew | 18 |
| 5 | N3oNEwh0qgPqPP3Em6wJXw | 9 |
| 5 | pMefTWo6gMdx8WhYSA2u3w | 2 |
Here I select the Users which are also in the Review table.
SELECT
user.id,
user.name,
SUM(user.review_count) AS ttlRev,
SUM(user.useful),
review.stars
FROM
user
JOIN
review
ON
review.user_id = user.id
GROUP BY
user.name
ORDER BY
ttlRev DESC
LIMIT
5| id | name | ttlRev | sum(user.useful) | stars |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -Hpah8QHUeWjSWq1qSIozQ | Ed | 919 | 178 | 3 |
| -hxUwfo3cMnLTv-CAaP69A | Crissy | 676 | 4 | 5 |
| -d4NT5rjIpZEz07f5rYtlg | Danny | 564 | 38 | 4 |
| --Qh8yKWAvIP4V4K8ZPfHA | Dixie | 503 | 21 | 4 |
| -0udWcFQEt2M8kM3xcIofw | Kaitlan | 470 | 60 | 4 |
But, for that User 'Ed', I could get only one business ID:
SELECT
business_id
FROM
review
WHERE
user_id = "-Hpah8QHUeWjSWq1qSIozQ"| business_id |
|---|
| 01Ov9eDxKRY5k6ImMdiWLQ |
From the previous result, I will check the business related to that second user 'ID: U4INQZOPSUaj8hMjLlZ3KA', cause is the one with the most amount of useful reviews.
SELECT
user_id,
useful,
business_id
FROM
review
WHERE
user_id = "U4INQZOPSUaj8hMjLlZ3KA"| user_id | useful | business_id |
|---|---|---|
| U4INQZOPSUaj8hMjLlZ3KA | 5 | pQ6e4fjq6kqRqLE6w8CfWQ |
| U4INQZOPSUaj8hMjLlZ3KA | 4 | KPV_FVNWkgmYh1ArVlt6kg |
| U4INQZOPSUaj8hMjLlZ3KA | 5 | 6Zogn4PXnK-ODBiRy5iz7Q |
| U4INQZOPSUaj8hMjLlZ3KA | 3 | NGjhZW6RTsMU17uDi5RaOQ |
| U4INQZOPSUaj8hMjLlZ3KA | 3 | OKZkEXzJt0XIamHRRTX-8g |
| U4INQZOPSUaj8hMjLlZ3KA | 9 | 2weQS-RnoOBhb1KsHKyoSQ |
| U4INQZOPSUaj8hMjLlZ3KA | 14 | rtlsfmdufArhk-47sWIf2w |
But ONLY ONE business is in the Business table!! =(
SELECT
review.user_id,
review.useful,
review.business_id,
business.name,
business.stars,
business.is_open
FROM
review
JOIN
business
ON
review.business_id = business.id
WHERE
user_id = "U4INQZOPSUaj8hMjLlZ3KA"| user_id | useful | business_id | name | stars | is_open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U4INQZOPSUaj8hMjLlZ3KA | 9 | 2weQS-RnoOBhb1KsHKyoSQ | The Buffet | 3.5 | 1 |
