Add Terminal Benchmark example drill#25
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThree files are added under ChangesTerminal Benchmark example directory
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~50 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Chunk
Examples-only Terminal Benchmark reference drill.
Goal
Move the useful Terminal Benchmark real API drill material out of dirty local state and into an explicit
examples/terminal_benchmark/boundary.Human-Approved Intent
This branch is not a Workstream product chunk. The user directed that Terminal Benchmark test material should not be applied into backend runtime or main product code, but may live under an
examples/directory as reference/demo material.What Changed
examples/terminal_benchmark/terminal_benchmark_api_e2e.py.examples/terminal_benchmark/README.md.examples/terminal_benchmark/LOCAL_VALIDATION_NOTES.md.Why It Changed
The old dirty work contained useful real-world Terminal Benchmark validation logic. Keeping it under
examples/preserves the learning without turning it into runtime code, required CI, or formal zero-trust loop evidence.Scope Control
Allowed Files Changed
examples/terminal_benchmark/**Files Outside Contract
Product Behavior
This does not touch backend app code, migrations, workflows, auth, checker runtime behavior, or frontend product code.
Evidence
Commands Run
Result Summary
Acceptance Criteria Proof
examples/terminal_benchmark/.Test Delta
Tests Added
Tests Modified
Tests Removed Or Skipped
Internal Reviewer Results
Reviewed code SHA:
0a6b66fReviewed at: 2026-06-21
Reviewer run IDs:
019eea24-2f3f-7c30-9102-569b3fa680c2,019eea25-448b-7701-b0a7-5e774b3146c2,019eea26-fe76-75c0-a847-7740446e2ff3,019eea29-7398-7c31-a218-a31477bdaed3,019eea46-6e49-7891-9984-33590a730724,019eea47-911c-7750-b965-213a43eedbbd,019eea55-2889-7d00-8773-64ef565a7c1a,019eea61-e60c-7140-933a-33c6cf274689External Review
External review response file: None for this examples-only PR.
CI And Gate Integrity
Remaining Risks
examples/and is not runtime or CI behavior.Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Tests