Skip to content

docs: clarify Harness of Harnesses as next-version direction - #368

Merged
cyfyifanchen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/clarify_next_version_positioning
Aug 27, 2026
Merged

docs: clarify Harness of Harnesses as next-version direction#368
cyfyifanchen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/clarify_next_version_positioning

Conversation

@cyfyifanchen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Clarify that the current public Raven release is the runnable self-improving Agent Harness.
  • Present The Harness of Harnesses as Raven's next-version direction and internal research prototype, not a capability of the current public release.
  • Align the English and Chinese banner notes, section headings, future-tense descriptions, and benchmark labels around that release boundary.

Type

  • Fix
  • Feature
  • Docs
  • CI / tooling
  • Refactor
  • Other

Verification

  • Relevant tests pass locally - not run because this is a docs-only change.
  • Relevant lint / type checks pass locally - .venv/bin/pre-commit run --files README.md README.zh-CN.md passed.
  • User-facing docs or screenshots are updated when needed
  • UV_CACHE_DIR=/private/tmp/raven-uv-cache make check-large-files passed.
  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD passed.

Risk

  • Security impact considered - no runtime code or dependencies changed.
  • Backward compatibility considered - documentation only.
  • Rollback path is clear for risky changes - revert the documentation commit.

Related Issues

N/A

@gloryfromca gloryfromca left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No blockers; this can merge as far as I am concerned.

I reviewed the complete github/main...HEAD diff. The English and Chinese READMEs consistently distinguish the runnable current public release from the next-version Harness of Harnesses direction, and both attribute the benchmark table to the internal research prototype. I found no concrete failure after checking the preceding positioning change and the surrounding README content.

Coverage: I checked AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md and CONTEXT-MAP.md (the newly used positioning terms have no conflicting glossary entry), the full diff, bilingual parity, predecessor history, backward compatibility, and test integrity. There are no code callers or runtime behavior changes, and no tests were changed or weakened.

Verification: uv run --frozen --python 3.12 --extra dev pre-commit run --files README.md README.zh-CN.md, the underlying scripts/check_large_files.py github/main..HEAD check, git diff --check github/main...HEAD, and the merge-tree check against current GitHub main all passed. The make check-large-files wrapper itself could not run because make is unavailable in this environment; its exact Python check passed directly. GitHub's pre-commit, lint, repository-file, TUI, bridge, Windows upgrade, title, and commit-message checks were passing when reviewed; the full unit job was still pending. Full local runtime tests were not run because this is a documentation-only change.

@cyfyifanchen
cyfyifanchen merged commit db7271c into main Aug 27, 2026
11 checks passed
@cyfyifanchen
cyfyifanchen deleted the docs/clarify_next_version_positioning branch August 27, 2026 08:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants