Bugfix related to checks for TwoLevelTree and StrategicStochasticProfile#92
Merged
Conversation
- StrategicProfile and TwoLevelTree for opex_fixed and - StrategicStochasticProfile for variables indexed over t_inv
StrategicProfile and TwoLevelTree for emission_limit
This was referenced Jun 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes two problems:
TwoLevelTreeandStrategicStochasticProfilein Added support forTwoLevelTreein checks #83 resulted in some issues when using, e.g.StrategicProfilewithTwoLevelTreefor fields which require that the profile can be indexed over strategic periods. Examples are the fixed OPEX and the emission limits.EnergyModelsInvestmentsrequired an adjustment to objective value in the investment test. The investment test should anyhow be updated to be more telling