test: Add inline wildcard coverage

[CathalMullan]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/suffixes.rs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 19 improved benchmarks
❌ 9 regressed benchmarks
✅ 176 untouched benchmarks
🆕 4 new benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	wildcard_nested_inline[10]	3.2 µs	3.3 µs	-4.58%
❌	Simulation	wildcard_chain[10]	16.1 µs	16.8 µs	-4%
❌	Simulation	dynamic_nested[1000]	260.2 µs	270.4 µs	-3.75%
❌	Simulation	wildcard_suffixes[1]	2.4 µs	2.5 µs	-3.71%
❌	Simulation	wildcard_suffixes[100]	2.5 µs	2.6 µs	-3.67%
❌	Simulation	wildcard_suffixes[10]	2.5 µs	2.6 µs	-3.67%
❌	Simulation	wildcard_suffixes[1000]	2.5 µs	2.6 µs	-3.67%
❌	Simulation	wildcard_depth[100]	2.4 µs	2.4 µs	-3.57%
❌	Simulation	wildcard_anchored[1000]	5.7 µs	5.8 µs	-3%
⚡	Simulation	dynamic_rescan[1000]	491.6 µs	450.4 µs	+9.17%
⚡	Simulation	dynamic_rescan[100]	56.2 µs	51.9 µs	+8.25%
⚡	Simulation	dynamic_inline[1000]	884.7 µs	822.7 µs	+7.54%
⚡	Simulation	dynamic_inline[100]	94 µs	87.6 µs	+7.28%
⚡	Simulation	wildcard_chain[1000]	971.5 µs	910.7 µs	+6.68%
⚡	Simulation	dynamic_rescan[10]	11.5 µs	10.8 µs	+6.49%
⚡	Simulation	wildcard_chain[100]	104.5 µs	98.5 µs	+6.01%
⚡	Simulation	dynamic_inline[10]	13.2 µs	12.5 µs	+5.96%
⚡	Simulation	wildcard_depth[1]	576.1 ns	546.9 ns	+5.33%
⚡	Simulation	wildcard_nested[1]	606.9 ns	577.8 ns	+5.05%
⚡	Simulation	wildcard_nested_inline[1]	606.9 ns	577.8 ns	+5.05%
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing fix-inline (292eca7) with main (4579fda)}