github-devloop implementation for #252

[loning]

github-devloop implementation PR for issue #252

[loning]

github-devloop PR child open

[loning]

github-devloop PR is ready for review

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[loning]

github-devloop PR is ready for review

[loning]

github-devloop PR review decision: approve
Three-angle verdicts: minimal=approve structural=approve delete=approve

minimal:
Established practice for a production slice on a thin SDK decode adapter is to preserve the existing parser and serde bridge, avoid expanding API surface, and pin Lua-facing behavior with black-box regression tests. From the provided diff, the PR follows the smallest coherent path: it adds focused real-Lua coverage for toml.decode invalid-input error text, representative scalar/table/array conversion, Lua sequence indexing, empty-document behavior, and continued absence of toml.encode, without adding unproven parser, conversion, or encode scope.

structural:
Established practice for this problem class is a thin SDK decode adapter over the canonical parser and existing serialization bridge, with the Lua boundary covered by black-box contract tests; this PR preserves that structure by adding only focused sdk_toml tests for toml.decode, continuing to rely on the existing toml crate and LuaSerdeExt, validating fail-closed toml.decode invalid-toml: behavior and Lua sequence semantics, and keeping toml.encode absent, so module boundaries and source-of-truth remain clean.

delete:
Established practice for SDK primitives is to avoid duplicate surface, expose only the accepted narrow operation, delegate parsing to a mature deterministic library, and lock the public boundary with black-box tests; under the delete angle, the relevant change is that PR #253 adds only regression coverage for the already-settled toml.decode surface, continues to prove toml.encode is absent, and introduces no parser, converter, or abstraction to delete, so there is no delete-specific blocker.

⟦AI:FKST⟧

[loning]

github-devloop is merging PR #253

[loning]

github-devloop merged PR #253