Skip to content

CC 0.7 §2.6.4: EphemeralResponse enters Tier-1 (§2.9) — Standards Action - #94

Merged
emooreatx merged 1 commit into
rc4from
amend-wire-vocab-ephemeral-response
Aug 21, 2026
Merged

CC 0.7 §2.6.4: EphemeralResponse enters Tier-1 (§2.9) — Standards Action#94
emooreatx merged 1 commit into
rc4from
amend-wire-vocab-ephemeral-response

Conversation

@emooreatx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ratifies the wire-vocabulary row for MessageType::EphemeralResponse, which CIRISEdge shipped in v18.2.0 without this amendment (the typed request/response correlation that made Edge::send a working API — it had been returning Err on success). CIRISConformance's test_520_wire_vocabulary drift gate caught it correctly: wheel-only, not in manifest.

The placement is derived from this manifest, not chosen:

  • Tier 2 is structurally unavailable. §3.1: "CIRISEdge holds no Tier-2 kind range by design… This is intentional, not an omission." The substrate's own reply mechanism has no Private-Use code point to ride.
  • §3.3's ethical-primitive test is the EXIT test toward Tier 2, and what exits must carry "the schema, its canonicalization, AND the convenience API into the range steward's own repo." This variant has none of those to carry: edge never parses the payload and the canonicalization is the outer envelope's.

So §2.9 states it as Tier-1 by exclusion rather than implying an ethical weight it does not have. Count 25 → 26.

Interop severity, for the record: an unratified variant is refused at parse by a conforming peer with an unknown-variant error enumerating the accepted set — so the pre-amendment consequence was fail-closed non-delivery of typed ephemeral replies against older peers, never a silent acceptance.

The conformance gate derives its accept-set from the §2 table (not a hand-copied list), so it goes green on the hash re-pin with nothing else to update.

Tracked as CIRISEdge#527.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01FejjcCbAbRFpLkmcgCDLEY

Standards Action on the hash-pinned wire vocabulary. CIRISEdge shipped
MessageType::EphemeralResponse in v18.2.0 (the typed request/response
correlation that made Edge::send a working API — it had been returning
Err on success) without this amendment. The cohabitation suite's
wire-vocabulary drift gate caught it correctly: wheel-only, not in
manifest.

The placement is derived from this manifest, not chosen:

- Tier 2 is structurally unavailable to it. §3.1: "CIRISEdge holds no
  Tier-2 kind range by design... This is intentional, not an omission."
  The substrate's own reply mechanism has no Private-Use code point.
- The §3.3 ethical-primitive test is the EXIT test toward Tier 2, and
  what exits must carry a schema, canonicalization and API into a range
  steward's repo. This variant has none: edge never parses the payload
  and the canonicalization is the outer envelope's.

So Tier-1 by exclusion, stated as such in §2.9 rather than implying an
ethical weight it does not have. Count 25 → 26; the conformance gate
(test_520_wire_vocabulary) derives its accept-set from this table, so it
goes green on the hash re-pin without a hand-copied list.

Interop note, for the record: a peer on an older edge refuses the variant
at PARSE with an unknown-variant error enumerating the accepted set — so
the pre-amendment consequence was fail-closed non-delivery of typed
ephemeral replies, never a silent acceptance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FejjcCbAbRFpLkmcgCDLEY
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@emooreatx
emooreatx merged commit 68553dd into rc4 Aug 21, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant