fix(logic): fold the N60/N70/N73 RESET resolution into C02 — RESET is level-local - #1
Open
JeremyJC67 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
fix(logic): fold the N60/N70/N73 RESET resolution into C02 — RESET is level-local#1JeremyJC67 wants to merge 1 commit into
JeremyJC67 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
… level-local
C02's Conditions still carried the N41 whole-game-restart reading, while the
trace had already adjudicated RESET as a per-level refresh (N60/N70 on L6;
N73 on L7, a `decision` node explicitly "resolv[ing] C02 in favour of
per-level refresh") and logic/problem.md + the L6/L7 recipes already state
"RESET is LEVEL-LOCAL". This performs the fold-in the C02 comments themselves
request ("for a researcher to fold the RESET clause into Conditions next
pass"):
- Conditions: whole-game-restart clause replaced by the level-local
semantics, with the L1–L5 untested boundary stated and N41 attributed to a
stale desync (per N73's adjudication)
- Sources: the reset-full-game (N41) grounding replaced by verbatim N73/N60
quotes per the number-grounding discipline
- Proof: points at the repeated L6/L7 level-local RESETs; the lone count-214
whole-game drop is kept, recontextualized as the suspected desync
- The two POSSIBLE CONTRADICTION comments collapse into one CONTRADICTION
RESOLVED note (house style per C12's resolved comment)
- trace/ untouched (append-only); Statement untouched (the RESET clause
lived in Conditions)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RSRisCyn8iHnBBuHMrWg6f
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Performs the reconciliation that C02's own comments request ("the two-instance evidence is recorded here for a researcher to fold the RESET clause into Conditions next pass"): folds the N60/N70/N73 per-level-refresh resolution of RESET semantics into C02, replacing the stale N41 whole-game-restart reading.
Why now
The artifact currently disagrees with itself about RESET:
trace/has already adjudicated: N73 is adecisionnode,status: resolved, titled "…resolves C02 in favour of per-level refresh", and attributes the N41 reading to a stale desync;logic/problem.mdalready states the level-local reading ("RESET restarts the current level (keepslevels_completed…)");logic/claims.mdC02 still carried the whole-game-restart clause — plus twoPOSSIBLE CONTRADICTIONHTML comments parked since 2026-06-29.Changes (logic/claims.md C02 only)
reset-full-game(N41) replaced by verbatim N73/N60 quotes, per the number-grounding disciplinePOSSIBLE CONTRADICTIONcomments collapse into oneCONTRADICTION RESOLVEDnote (house style per C12's resolved comment)trace/untouched (append-only);Statementuntouched (the RESET clause lived inConditions)Verification
No new gameplay evidence is introduced or needed: the ARA already contains two independent confirming sessions (N60/N70 on L6; N73 on L7, incl. a RESET taken at %%=4 restoring full lives), and N73 is already a resolved adjudication. This PR is purely the Stage-4-style fold-in of that existing resolution. Edits were applied by an anchored patch that asserts each anchor matches exactly once; post-edit grep confirms no stale copy of the whole-game reading remains in
logic/.Context
Found while preparing ARA-Labs/Agent-Native-Research-Artifact#24 (a proposal for a sanctioned reader-side contradiction-report channel) — this C02 case is its motivating example: the L6/L7 observations were reader-side corrections with nowhere structured to go.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01RSRisCyn8iHnBBuHMrWg6f