Building autonomous AI infrastructure, high-performance DeFi,
and privacy-first blockchain protocols from the ground up.
Solidus Network is a high-performance perpetuals exchange built on a multi-algorithm, multi-chain DAGKNIGHT architecture. Forked from Quai Network and re-engineered with 4 zones per region, each running a different mining algorithm for a different hardware class — ASIC, GPU, CPU, and Mobile miners all participate without competing against each other. Built-in perps core with on-chain order matching. Research benchmarks are matching Hyperliquid-class speeds and TPS.
DAGKNIGHT consensus runs at the zone level where transaction throughput matters. Region and Prime chains use entropic block ordering
Each region contains 4 parallel zones, each running a distinct consensus algorithm. Miners of different hardware classes never compete against each other — each class has its own dedicated zone with balanced difficulty, ensuring fair participation from enterprise ASICs down to mobile devices.
| Zone | Algorithm | Hardware Class | Design Goal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zone 1 | SHA-256 | ASIC miners | Maximum hashrate throughput |
| Zone 2 | ProgPoW | GPU miners (NVIDIA/AMD) | Memory-hard, ASIC-resistant |
| Zone 3 | RandomX-S | CPU miners | Modified RandomX — breaks Antminer RandomX ASICs |
| Zone 4 | Panthera | Mobile devices | Lightweight mobile-optimized algorithm |
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Throughput | Hyperliquid-competitive TPS (200,000+ ops/sec) |
| Zone Consensus | DAGKNIGHT — completed from Kaspa research |
| Region/Prime | Entropic block ordering (no DAG overhead) |
| Order Matching | Sub-second on-chain execution |
| Finality | Instant at zone level, cross-region within epoch |
| Architecture | Quai fork — hierarchical, sharded, merged-mined |
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| On-Chain Order Book | Fully on-chain limit/market order matching — no off-chain sequencer |
| Cross-Margin | Unified margin across positions with portfolio-level risk |
| Liquidation Engine | MEV-resistant liquidation with keeper incentives |
| Funding Rates | Decentralized oracle-fed funding rate mechanism |
| Multi-Collateral | Multiple collateral types with real-time mark pricing |
Innova is a hybrid PoW/PoS privacy blockchain with 1,500+ commits, built on the Tribus hashing algorithm (three NIST5 algorithms), ~15s block times, and a hardcapped 18M supply. Five-layer privacy architecture, decentralized services layer, and a Collateral Node network.
¹ Layer 4 Silent Shielding: RPC commands registered (sp_send, sp_getnewaddress);
|
Privacy & Staking
|
Decentralized Services
|
Network Specifications
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Algorithm | Tribus PoW (3x NIST5) + PoS (6% annual) |
| Block Time | ~15 seconds |
| Total Supply | 18,000,000 INN |
| Collateral Nodes | 25,000 INN collateral, 65% block reward |
| Confirmations | 10 required, 75 block maturity |
| Stake Age | 10-hour minimum |
| BIP39 Coin Type | 116 |
| Ports | P2P 14530, RPC 14531, CN 14539 |
| Atomic Swaps | BIP65 CLTV |
| Multi-Sig | Native support |
The first block DAG with DAGKNIGHT adaptive ordering, PoS finality, and full zero-knowledge privacy.
IDAG is Innova's next-generation consensus — a four-phase migration from linear blockchain to a high-throughput block DAG. First to implement epoch-anchored FCMP++ membership proofs in a DAG and adaptive DAGKNIGHT k inference.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Block Interval | ~1 second (post-DAG fork at block 7,450,000) |
| Block Size | 300 KB floor – 8 MB ceiling (adaptive median over 1000-block window) |
| Finality | TENTATIVE (⅓ stake) → SOFT (½ stake) → HARD (⅔ stake, 3 consecutive epochs) |
| GHOSTDAG | Fixed k=18, pre-DAGKNIGHT ordering |
| DAGKNIGHT | Adaptive k=3..32 (EMA-inferred, activates at block 7,500,000) |
| Fork Resolution | POEM — GetBlockEntropy() computes entropy from inverted block hash (staged) |
| Epoch | 300 blocks (~5 min), min 2 unique voters for finality |
| Privacy | Epoch-anchored FCMP++ membership proofs via dual curve tree (secp256k1 + Ed25519) with deterministic DAG-ordered commits |
INVS is the shielded asset layer within the Innova ecosystem — fully private value transfer with ZK-proof verification, leveraging all five privacy layers and IDAG's throughput for high-frequency confidential transactions.
Project Lavalamp is a hardware-software security product that masks the AMD Zen 5 SMT port contention timing side-channel — a 27.6% signal leakage vulnerability that AMD, Google, Microsoft, and NVIDIA all declined to fix. At its core is a proprietary entropy engine that generates high-quality dither patterns to bury timing signals below the detection floor. Validated on live FPGA hardware — 8/8 NIST-class statistical quality tests pass, 98.4% Shannon entropy efficiency, with integrity sealing across every released bitstream.
- Hardware validation complete on the Artix-7 reference platform — full end-to-end signal-masking loop running on live silicon.
- Shield (software) tier daemon feature-complete on x86 and ARM Neoverse with 93% leak reduction at ~6% CPU overhead.
- Lite (USB-FPGA) tier shipping across 7 Artix-7 boards with 99%+ leak reduction at <1% host overhead.
- Pro (PCIe) tier in active development — kernel driver and TLP-inference pipeline under bring-up.
- Phase 2 porting effort underway — extending the FPGA build system to 17 boards across 6 vendors.
| Tier | Form Factor | Leak Reduction | CPU Overhead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shield | CPU-only software daemon (x86 / ARM Neoverse) | 93% | 6% |
| Lite | USB FPGA bitstream + host daemon — 7+ Artix-7 boards | 99%+ | <1% |
| Pro (in dev) | PCIe FPGA card + kernel driver + TLP inference | 99%+ | ~0% |
One command per supported board — vivado -mode batch -source build_board.tcl -tclargs <board>. Currently shipping on the Artix-7 family; Phase 2 validates across 17 FPGA boards spanning 6 vendors (AMD/Xilinx, Intel/Altera, Lattice, Gowin, Microchip).
| Vendor | Families | Status |
|---|---|---|
| AMD / Xilinx | Artix-7, Kintex-7, Virtex UltraScale+ | 7 boards shipping · Kintex/UltraScale validation in progress |
| Intel / Altera | Cyclone V SoC | Planned (Phase 2) |
| Lattice | ECP5 | Planned (Phase 2) |
| Gowin | GW2A | Planned (Phase 2) |
| Microchip | PolarFire SoC | Planned (Phase 2) |
| Vendor | Tracking ID | Response |
|---|---|---|
| AMD | AMD-NSACNT3N |
"Expected Behavior" |
| Google / Chromium | Issue 475937586 |
"Won't Fix" |
| Microsoft MSRC | VULN-171518 |
"Does not meet criteria" |
| NVIDIA PSIRT | Tracking 5775002 |
"Expected behavior" |
Disabling SMT mitigates the leak but costs ~50% of compute capacity. Lavalamp recovers 97% of that capacity while reducing leakage by 93–99% depending on tier. No other product targets this specific vulnerability at the hardware level.
Git for agent runs. Fork, replay, resume any execution.
~250 lines of core · Any model · Zero lock-in · Public beta v0.1.x on PyPI
A tine is the prong of a fork. opentine literally forks your agent runs.
Every agent execution becomes a run tree — content-addressed, serializable, forkable. Pause on your laptop, resume on a server. Branch from step 7 with a different prompt. Diff two runs side by side.
pip install opentinefrom opentine import Agent
from opentine.models.anthropic import Anthropic
agent = Agent(model=Anthropic("claude-sonnet-4-20250514"))
run = agent.run_sync("What is opentine?")
run.save("result.tine")tine show result.tineMatches current PyPI releases in the 0.1.x line — lightweight agent SDK, stable .tine serialization, full CLI (run, ls, show, replay, fork, diff, resume). Native adapters for Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Ollama; OpenAI-compatible wrappers for Kimi, DeepSeek, Qwen, GLM, Groq, Together, Mistral.
Your agent fails after many steps — fork before the bad tool call instead of burning tokens from step zero:
tine show failed_run.tine
tine fork failed_run.tine --from-step 3 --save fixed_run.tine
tine diff failed_run.tine fixed_run.tine| Install size | Forkable runs | Any model | Core LOC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LangChain | 166 MB | No | Partial | ~200k |
| LangGraph | 51 MB | Checkpoints only | Partial | ~50k |
| CrewAI | 173 MB | No | Partial | ~30k |
| smolagents | 198 MB | No | Partial | ~15k |
| opentine | <5 MB | Yes | Yes | ~250 |
tine run <script.py> Execute agent, stream steps, save run tree
tine ls List recent runs (status, cost, model)
tine show <run_id> Pretty-print the tree (like git log --graph)
tine replay <id> [--from N] Replay from a step
tine fork <id> --from-step N Branch a new run
tine diff <run_a> <run_b> Side-by-side comparison
tine resume <run_id> Resume a paused run
Tools are plain Python callables — opentine introspects type hints. Common symbols from opentine.tools:
| Module | Callables |
|---|---|
web |
web.fetch |
search |
search.search |
fs |
fs.read, fs.write |
shell |
shell.run |
Optional extras (e.g. python) live in the same package when you want sandboxed scripting steps — see upstream docs.
from opentine import Agent
from opentine.models.anthropic import Anthropic
from opentine.tools import web, search, fs, shell
agent = Agent(
model=Anthropic("claude-sonnet-4-20250514"),
tools=[web.fetch, search.search, fs.read, fs.write, shell.run],
)Native backends (opentine.models)
| Backend | Wrapper | Example model ID |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropic | Anthropic |
claude-sonnet-4-20250514 |
| OpenAI | OpenAI |
gpt-4o |
Google |
gemini-2.0-flash |
|
| Local / Ollama | Ollama |
llama3.1 |
OpenAI-compatible (opentine.models.compat — one shared SDK surface)
| Provider | Wrapper | Example model ID |
|---|---|---|
| Kimi (Moonshot) | Kimi |
moonshot-v1-8k |
| DeepSeek | DeepSeek |
deepseek-chat |
| Qwen | Qwen |
qwen-plus |
| Zhipu (GLM) | GLM |
glm-4-flash |
| Groq | Groq |
llama-3.1-70b-versatile |
| Together | Together |
meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct-Turbo |
| Mistral | Mistral |
mistral-large-latest |
Wire-up is always Agent(model=…(...)) after the matching from opentine.models… import (see Quickstart for a full runnable Anthropic snippet).
MEV & Ethereum Infrastructure — Block builder tooling (Rust), P2P mempool crawlers, EVM benchmarking, and DeFi protocol analysis.
Cryptanalysis & Bitcoin Research — UTXO analysis, chainstate parsing, vanity address generation, and parallel cryptanalysis tooling.
AI/ML — Autonomous agent architectures, multimodal models, and research aligned with agent-first design philosophy.




