Replies: 10 comments 7 replies
|
I've made a |
|
When generating typedocs, should they be generated from each package's |
|
@xeolabs I saw you started some fix for tsconfigs. Generally, I wanted to create two packages in the repo, if possible, in |
Yes this sounds good to me. |
|
Two more points occurred to me:
|
|
Hey guys, I have one question, cause I get the idea of having develop branch and protecting the main one, but could you please explain to me the reason of switching default branch into develop? Shouldn't the main branch still be the default one? |
|
As I understand it, "develop" is the default branch because when contributors want to branch-and-PR they would be making the branch off "develop". Also, "main" wont contain anything until there is releasable code in "develop" to merge into it. |
|
Hi @DhivinX I'm having trouble getting things to build and I can't figure out what's not working. Could you please take a look? I'm doing a fresh clone, then checking out the If you can see anything that stands out, that would be much appreciated. AKAIK I can't see anything I broke with the configs etc.. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello!
We could add Github Actions configuration to automate the publishing of packages when changes are pushed to the main branch. You would need to add a develop branch for the current code and a main branch would be the alive branch. Then when we merge the develop branch into main it would automatically publish the packages to the registry.
Then the workflow looks like this:
featureorfixbranch fromdevelopbranch (ex. feat/register-form)developdeveloptomainWe could set the
mainbranch as a protected branch, so that no one can commit directly tomain, only PR fromdevelop.What do you think?
Please share any thoughts.
All reactions