Skip to content

Async thrust #298

@gmerlo

Description

@gmerlo

This is not really an issue but more a question. Do you @germasch and @bd4 think it makes sense to support also the thrust ansyc api in addition to what is now supported or you don't see the need/is too complicated? I believe now even if one executes a reduction on a async stream, thrust still syncs

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions