Saw you're standing up 13 repos at once (contracts, SDK, docs, mobile, AI models, governance, storage) — that's a lot of surface area to get documented and tested consistently before mainnet, especially with docs and the SDK still fresh.
Verdikta (bounties.verdikta.org) is an open-source AI-jury evaluation platform on Base — post QA bounties per repo (e.g. "SDK method X has accurate docs + working example", "mobile app screen Y matches API contract"), a GPT+Claude jury grades submissions against your rubric, escrow releases automatically (~$0.45/eval). Given the scale of what you're building at once, this could cover a lot of ground fast without a dedicated in-house QA team.
Happy to sketch a sample rubric for vit-docs specifically if useful.
Saw you're standing up 13 repos at once (contracts, SDK, docs, mobile, AI models, governance, storage) — that's a lot of surface area to get documented and tested consistently before mainnet, especially with docs and the SDK still fresh.
Verdikta (bounties.verdikta.org) is an open-source AI-jury evaluation platform on Base — post QA bounties per repo (e.g. "SDK method X has accurate docs + working example", "mobile app screen Y matches API contract"), a GPT+Claude jury grades submissions against your rubric, escrow releases automatically (~$0.45/eval). Given the scale of what you're building at once, this could cover a lot of ground fast without a dedicated in-house QA team.
Happy to sketch a sample rubric for vit-docs specifically if useful.