Skip to content

Soften the pack.content.images validation #94

@JPedro2

Description

@JPedro2

Should we look at easing up the pack.content.images validation given that there are use-cases where users either create packs that do not have container images OR they don't actually need/want to have pack.content.images as part of their pack building flow/process.

Should we create a WARN instead of throwing an ERR and breaking the validation altogether?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions