Purpose
Start the BuildingOS branch of the China Interoperability Initiative (CII). BuildingOS must consume ClimateOS climate-driver evidence without pretending that a global climate signal directly determines a site or building outcome.
Work packages
CII-BUILD-01 — Climate Context Intake Contract
Define how BuildingOS receives:
- climate driver state;
- regional tendency;
- local hazard candidate;
- observed event evidence;
- uncertainty and time window;
- provider and model provenance.
CII-BUILD-02 — Contaminated Land to Redevelopment Workflow
Create the evidence chain:
historical land use → screening → investigation → risk assessment → remediation → validation → planning/building constraint → redevelopment
Include boundary versioning, qualified-provider evidence, authority status and permitted land use.
CII-BUILD-03 — Waste and Circular Material Passport
Extend material evidence across:
manufacture → construction → operation → demolition → transport → treatment → reuse/recycling → final disposal
Do not treat transport records as proof of recovery or lawful final disposal.
CII-BUILD-04 — Climate-Sensitive Building Risk Translation
Prepare controlled mappings for:
- drought/soil movement;
- extreme rainfall/flooding;
- heat;
- bushfire weather;
- wind and tropical cyclone exposure;
- water supply stress.
Each mapping must separate climate tendency from site hazard, building exposure, vulnerability and observed damage.
Guardrails
- BuildingOS does not independently diagnose ENSO, IOD, SAM or tropical-cyclone tracks.
- No global climate index directly triggers a compliance conclusion.
- No contamination, waste or legal status is inferred solely from AI or remote sensing.
- Australian and Chinese planning/building/legal rules remain jurisdiction-specific.
Initial deliverables
docs/integration/CLIMATEOS_CLIMATE_CONTEXT_INTAKE_CONTRACT_V0_1.md
docs/workflows/CONTAMINATED_LAND_REDEVELOPMENT_EVIDENCE_WORKFLOW_V0_1.md
docs/workflows/WASTE_CIRCULAR_MATERIAL_PASSPORT_V0_1.md
docs/risk/CLIMATE_DRIVER_TO_BUILDING_RISK_TRANSLATION_V0_1.md
- Static examples for one Australian site and one China placeholder jurisdiction, with no fabricated compliance result.
Acceptance criteria
- Climate driver, site hazard, building exposure, vulnerability and impact are separate objects.
- Every translated risk carries provenance, uncertainty, spatial scale and validity period.
- Workflows can accept future ClimateOS outputs without hard-coding MAZU or any single provider.
- No live external integration, legal conclusion or real-project claim is introduced without Founder review.
Purpose
Start the BuildingOS branch of the China Interoperability Initiative (CII). BuildingOS must consume ClimateOS climate-driver evidence without pretending that a global climate signal directly determines a site or building outcome.
Work packages
CII-BUILD-01 — Climate Context Intake Contract
Define how BuildingOS receives:
CII-BUILD-02 — Contaminated Land to Redevelopment Workflow
Create the evidence chain:
historical land use → screening → investigation → risk assessment → remediation → validation → planning/building constraint → redevelopmentInclude boundary versioning, qualified-provider evidence, authority status and permitted land use.
CII-BUILD-03 — Waste and Circular Material Passport
Extend material evidence across:
manufacture → construction → operation → demolition → transport → treatment → reuse/recycling → final disposalDo not treat transport records as proof of recovery or lawful final disposal.
CII-BUILD-04 — Climate-Sensitive Building Risk Translation
Prepare controlled mappings for:
Each mapping must separate climate tendency from site hazard, building exposure, vulnerability and observed damage.
Guardrails
Initial deliverables
docs/integration/CLIMATEOS_CLIMATE_CONTEXT_INTAKE_CONTRACT_V0_1.mddocs/workflows/CONTAMINATED_LAND_REDEVELOPMENT_EVIDENCE_WORKFLOW_V0_1.mddocs/workflows/WASTE_CIRCULAR_MATERIAL_PASSPORT_V0_1.mddocs/risk/CLIMATE_DRIVER_TO_BUILDING_RISK_TRANSLATION_V0_1.mdAcceptance criteria