Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
|
Originally Since the package is not used much (pretty much always just used as dependency of rapidfuzz) I think there is little reason to keep the package in the Gentoo package index. |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
We've noticed that jarowinkler(-cpp) has been integrated into rapidfuzz(-cpp). Does that mean that the standalone version will effectively no longer be maintained? i'm asking as a package maintainer, primarily in context of whether keeping separate jarowinkler packages in Gentoo makes sense or whether I should remove them in favor of rapidfuzz.
All reactions