A test was done by picking out the characters with "cá" and "nháy" marks in the PUA and recreating them using the combining marks. A number of characters failed to combine correctly.
I have excluded the characters whose base characters (without cá or nháy) are not yet in Unicode.
I have highlighted in grey those characters that visually have such parts, but where I am uncertain if those parts are indeed those marks and not part of the characters themselves, or if the base characters are cognate. If they are not intended to be such, they can be ignored. Additionally, highlighted yellow and blue are characters that could use variation selectors, but currently are not implemented.
Finally, there are a large number of characters with what appears to be an alternate form of nháy (the mark itself is mapped to F1F09), and some share a base character with the "default" nháy, while others are unique.
Would it be possible to use the combining nháy to map to these characters, or should this be treated as a separate diacritic not yet in Unicode?
A test was done by picking out the characters with "cá" and "nháy" marks in the PUA and recreating them using the combining marks. A number of characters failed to combine correctly.
I have excluded the characters whose base characters (without cá or nháy) are not yet in Unicode.
I have highlighted in grey those characters that visually have such parts, but where I am uncertain if those parts are indeed those marks and not part of the characters themselves, or if the base characters are cognate. If they are not intended to be such, they can be ignored. Additionally, highlighted yellow and blue are characters that could use variation selectors, but currently are not implemented.
Finally, there are a large number of characters with what appears to be an alternate form of nháy (the mark itself is mapped to F1F09), and some share a base character with the "default" nháy, while others are unique.
Would it be possible to use the combining nháy to map to these characters, or should this be treated as a separate diacritic not yet in Unicode?