Inline the syntax highlighting schema?

[eyeinsky]

The generator template links to a json schema outside the project (by the github user martinring, here) -- if the schema is a good thing to include, could it perhaps be inlined into this repository? Otherwise if that file is removed or changed, it has an impact on downstream users; and also the legitimacy of the schema is easier to assess when that link is found in a syntax highlighter.

[RedCMD]

and also the legitimacy of the schema is easier to assess when that link is found in a syntax highlighter

what do you mean by this?
currently most people have that schema link in their syntax highlighters already

having it link externally does mean if there are any fixes there
it then propagates globally to everyone instantly

I also maintain a updated version of the schema

[eyeinsky]

Currently, when I see that link to a schema, it appears to be a link to a random file by a random github user: I don't know whether the schema is complete, is it official, widely adopted or will it stay around. It may very well be all that, but I can't tell from the url. It is clear though that the repo is not owned by Microsoft, but by a private github user.

Thus I'm asking that maybe the schema by Martin Ring that the generator links to (or an improved derivative, if, e.g, yours is even more complete) could be included within this repository instead? This could be then linked from generated highlighter configurations and it would be clear that the schema has some legitimacy.