Where rules-extension style advanced flow rule names include selected attributes enclosed in <> (e.g. ,, etc.) these are being stripped from the Attribute Flows table in the HTML report (Mapping Type column).
e.g. a VB rules extension file might have the following code under the MapAttributesForImport mapping to the advanced flow rule cd.user:<dn>->mv.person:domain:
Select Case FlowRuleName
Case "cd.user:<dn>->mv.person:domain"
...
However, in the HTML report this will appear (incorrectly) as the following Attribute Flow:
Rules Extension - cd.user:->mv.person:domain
The downside of the report doing this is that searches of the code base for the above Rules Extension name will return no matches.
Where rules-extension style advanced flow rule names include selected attributes enclosed in <> (e.g. ,, etc.) these are being stripped from the Attribute Flows table in the HTML report (Mapping Type column).
e.g. a VB rules extension file might have the following code under the MapAttributesForImport mapping to the advanced flow rule cd.user:<dn>->mv.person:domain:
Select Case FlowRuleName
Case "cd.user:<dn>->mv.person:domain"
...
However, in the HTML report this will appear (incorrectly) as the following Attribute Flow:
Rules Extension - cd.user:->mv.person:domain
The downside of the report doing this is that searches of the code base for the above Rules Extension name will return no matches.