Skip to content

Wrong verdict on simple example with Xs #8

Description

@shaunazzopardi

Hey,

On the latest version of Strix (21.0.0), I am getting a realisable verdict on the following .tlsf file:

INFO {
	TITLE:       ""
	DESCRIPTION: ""
	SEMANTICS:   Mealy
	TARGET:      Mealy
}
MAIN {
	INPUTS { 
		x;
		y;
		z;
	}
	OUTPUTS { 
	}
	ASSUMPTIONS {
		X(x || y);
		X(!x && y)
	}
	GUARANTEES { 
		z
	}
}

It seems to me this should be umrealisable (the environment can always choose to make !x && y true in the next state, satisfying both assumptions).

To identify the source of the error I tried small modifications, e.g., remove the Xs from the assumptions, join the two assumptions into one (X((x || y) && !x && y)) turning the Xs into Gs, or changing the guarantee to false. Strix gives the correct verdict in all these cases.

It seems the issue is with how X is dealt with internally. Note the issue also disappears if the X is propagated in the first assumption, i.e. to (X(x)) || (X(y)).

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions