Simplification in movePts?

[ReneSac]

Why write:

Pts[i].VX += windX * 1 / Pts[i].R;

and not simply:

Pts[i].VX += windX / Pts[i].R;

(in all source files, and for Y and Z dimensions too)? It got me thinking about operator precedence... but of course it don't matters... :/

[logicchains]

That's a very good point. I think I've just been spoiled by compilers that do this kind of constant folding automatically, so for readability's sake I left it unsimplified. The lisps, Java and C# could definitely benefit however, so I'll update them now.